Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Large Firm
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Technology
    • Washington
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Resume
    • The Careerist Blog
    • News & Views
  • LawCatalog Store
    • Books Online
    • Best-Selling Books
    • Books
    • Directories
    • E-Newsletters
    • Magazines
    • Newspapers
    • Newsletters
    • Surveys
    • Research Services
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
  • email
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • alert
  • rss

Law.com Home > Federal Judge Lets Puns Fly in Keeping Suit Against Bon Jovi Alive

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Federal Judge Lets Puns Fly in Keeping Suit Against Bon Jovi Alive

By Shannon P. Duffy All Articles 

The Legal Intelligencer

June 8, 2009

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

World-famous rock stars don't just have the power to make teenage girls scream -- they can also make a federal judge go a little pun crazy.

That was the case last week when U.S. District Judge Michael M. Baylson saw that rocker Jon Bon Jovi -- who also happens to be one of the owners of the Philadelphia Soul arena football team -- was one of the parties in a pending copyright and trademark suit.

In the opening paragraphs of his 29-page opinion in AFL Philadelphia v. Krause, Baylson managed to squeeze four Bon Jovi song references and three football terms into his outline of the court battle.

Baylson noted that the Philadelphia Soul "rose in a 'Blaze of Glory' to win the 2008 national championship Arena Bowl and then was 'Shot Through the Heart' when its 2009 season was cancelled by the League due to financial problems." The team and the league, Baylson said, "remain 'Living on a Prayer' that they will return in the 2010 season."

But in the meantime, Baylson said, the Philadelphia Soul and a former employee "are trading accusations concerning the fall-out of the season's cancellation, in which they each experienced a taste of 'Bad Medicine.'"

In the "kick off" of the battle, Baylson said, AFL Philadelphia and Bongiovi (the actual surname of the rocker) brought copyright and trademark infringement claims against Joseph Krause Jr., the team's former sales manager who, responding with a "turnover," brought counterclaims under the Lanham Act and for misappropriation of his name.

AFL Philadelphia's lawyers moved to dismiss Krause's counterclaims, but Baylson refused, saying: "In the 'first quarter' of what will undoubtedly be a hard fought battle, this court will declare defendant the winner and deny plaintiffs' motion."

Baylson's light-hearted, quick description of the case belies its true tenor. Court records show that the litigation has been hard fought and a bit ugly.

In the opening salvo, Krause sued the team in state court, claiming he was owed nearly $125,000 dollars in outstanding wages. The team removed that suit to federal court but lost the venue battle when the case was remanded back to state court.

In a separate suit, the team is claiming in federal court that Krause illegally made and sold championship rings and, in doing so, misappropriated the team's logo and the ring design.

Krause's lawyers, George Bochetto and David Heim of Bochetto & Lentz, responded to that suit by filing counterclaims that accuse the team of misusing Krause's name after he was fired.

In the counterclaim, Krause claims that an e-mail sent to fans about the season cancellation was falsely designated as being sent by Krause, even though he had no role in drafting it and had already been fired at the time it was sent.

Krause claims the team's motive was to cause confusion among fans and to falsely associate Krause with the unpopular decision to cancel the 2009 season and the resulting controversy over season ticket refunds.

The lawyers representing Bon Jovi and the team -- Camille M. Miller and Melanie A. Miller of Cozen O'Connor -- urged Baylson to toss out the counterclaims, arguing that Krause lacked standing to sue under the Lanham Act because he had failed to allege any "competitive harm" and because his name is not a "legally protectable mark."

Baylson disagreed, saying Krause satisfied the test for establishing that his name has attained "secondary meaning" by alleging that he is well-known in the sports and entertainment business as a media personality and public relations specialist.

The team's lawyers also argued that recipients of the allegedly infringing e-mail could not be confused as to its origin because it reflected and indeed did originate from the Philadelphia Soul.

Baylson disagreed, finding that since the e-mail to the fans came from "krause@philadelphiasoul.com and carried the subject line "From: Joe Krause," the counterclaims adequately pleaded a likelihood of confusion.

Camille Miller could not be reached for comment on the ruling. Bochetto declined to be interviewed.



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Cozen O'Connor

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Bon Jovi
  • Bochetto & Lentz

Key categories

    
  • Trademark

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  4. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  5. New District Judge Takes Firm Line on Attorney Conduct
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Law.com Network
  • ADVERTISE

law.com

  • Tour the New Site
  • Newswire
  • Special Reports
  • International News
  • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
  • Legal Blogs
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Site Map

alm national

  • The American Lawyer
  • The Am Law Litigation Daily
  • Corporate Counsel
  • Law Technology News
  • The National Law Journal

alm regional

  • Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Daily Business Review (FL)
  • Delaware Law Weekly
  • Daily Report (GA)
  • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
  • New Jersey Law Journal
  • New York Law Journal
  • GC New York
  • The Recorder (CA)
  • Texas Lawyer
  • The Asian Lawyer
  • Focus Europe

directories

  • ALM Experts
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
  • Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Legal Recruiter's Directory
  • Corporate Counsel Top Rated Lawyers
  • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
  • National Directory of Minority Attorneys
  • Go-To Law firms of the Top 500 Companies

books & newsletters

  • Best-Selling Books
  • Publication E-Alerts
  • Law Journal Newsletters
  • LawCatalog Store
  • Law Journal Press Online

research

  • ALM Legal Intelligence
  • Court Reporters
  • MA 3000
  • Verdict Search
  • ALM Experts
  • Legal Dictionary
  • Smart Litigator

events & conferences

  • ALM Events
  • LegalTech®
  • Virtual LegalTech®
  • Virtual Events
  • Webinars & Online Events
  • Insight Information

reprints

  • Reprints

online cle

  • CLE Center

career

  • Lawjobs
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions |  ALM User License Agreement