Incisive Media's Law.com
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
Register for Law.com Newswire
Newsletters
RSS

Law.com Home > 3rd Circuit: Parents Can't Sue Under No Child Left Behind Act

Font Size: increase font decrease font

3rd Circuit: Parents Can't Sue Under No Child Left Behind Act

Shannon P. Duffy

The Legal Intelligencer

November 21, 2008

  • deliciousdel.icio.us
  • digg Digg
  • redditReddit
  • facebookFacebook
  • googleGoogle Bookmarks
  • newsvineNewsvine
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • mixxMixx
  • stumbleuponStumbleupon
  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Parents have no right to sue under the federal No Child Left Behind Act because Congress designed the law only to regulate school districts and never included any "rights creating" language that would allow individuals to seek enforcement through lawsuits, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

The decision Thursday in Newark Parents Association v. Newark Public Schools marks the first time that a federal appellate court has refused to recognize a private cause of action under the NCLB.

But U.S. Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry found that numerous federal district courts have addressed the issue and were unanimous in holding that the law "does not confer a right of action enforceable by individuals."

In the suit, a proposed class of parents and children complained that a high percentage of Newark’s schools have been labeled as failing or "in need of improvement," but that Newark school officials violated the law's requirements that parents be notified of: the fact that their children were enrolled in deficient schools; their right to transfer from failing schools to nonfailing schools; or their right to demand "supplemental educational services."

In the appeal, attorneys Scott M. Michelman of the American Civil Liberties Union, along with professor Emily B. Goldberg of Seton Hall Law School argued that U.S. District Judge Susan D. Wigenton of the District of New Jersey erred in dismissing the suit by failing to recognize that the parents were demanding only that the law's notice provisions be honored.

Barry disagreed, saying the lower court correctly found there was no implied cause of action. "Only the Secretary of Education can enforce a state's violation of the act," Barry wrote in an opinion joined by Judges Thomas L. Ambro and Kent A. Jordan.

"The overall structure of the act supports the conclusion that Congress did not intend to confer enforceable individual rights," Barry wrote. Attorney Adam S. Herman of the Newark Public Schools office of general counsel argued the appeal for the school district.

 



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Advertisement

Top Stories From Law.com

Legal Technology

  • Public Performance in the Digital Age

Corporate Counsel

  • United Technologies Takes a Stand, Puts Billable Hour 'on Life Support'

Small Firm Business

  • Holiday Parties: Keeping Expenses Low and Deductibility High

Advertisement

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS >>

POST A JOB >>

Advertisement

About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions
Close [ X ]