Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > If a Scratch-Off Is a Rip-Off, Litigation May Be the Prize

Font Size: increase font decrease font

If a Scratch-Off Is a Rip-Off, Litigation May Be the Prize

By Tresa Baldas All Articles 

The National Law Journal

September 5, 2008

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Lottery Winners Lose Tax Appeal Before 3rd Circuit
If your scratch-off is a rip-off, prepare to pay up.

Disgruntled lottery and sweepstakes consumers are filing a host of lawsuits claiming that instant tickets promise a lot, but can't deliver.

In Virginia, a business professor is suing the Virginia Lottery for allegedly selling roughly $85 million in defective scratch-offs, claiming the tickets had no chance of winning the top prizes because they had already been claimed. Hoover v. Virginia Commonwealth, No. CL08-3140 (Richmond City, Va., Cir. Ct.).

Similar challenges have been filed in Arizona, California, Colorado and Washington state.

And in New York, scratch-off tickets also turned into a liability for an auto dealer accused of using bogus sweepstakes promotions to lure consumers into its dealerships.

The New York attorney general last month ordered Five Towns Mitsubishi to pay $150,000 in restitution and fines over a scratch-off called Dash for Cash, which featured a cash prize, free car, vacation, gas or a $1,000 shopping spree.

As it turned out, nearly all tickets were winners, but the vacation and shopping spree prizes were nearly impossible to attain because of restrictions such as blackout periods, according to the attorney general's office.

Officials, as well as legal counsel, for Five Towns could not be reached for comment.

Private attorneys, meanwhile, are warning companies that want to use lottery tickets as a way to boost sales to beware of botched-up games.

"I think sweepstakes and lotteries and [those] sort of million-dollar offers are an increasing company advertising feature. And smaller companies are getting into the act. It is a way to generate buzz," said David Bloch, an intellectual property partner in the San Francisco office of Winston & Strawn.

Bloch said smaller businesses, however, are especially vulnerable to scratch-off liability because they don't realize that "there are all kinds of unfair competition laws constraining what you can and cannot offer."

Bloch's advice to companies that want to use instant sweepstakes for marketing promotions: Get a lawyer first. Ensure that all prizes are fairly available with no blackout dates and no use-within-three-weeks rules.

"Those are all great excuses to go ahead and sue," Bloch warned.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Winston & Strawn

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Virginia Lottery
  • Hoover

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  4. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media