Font Size: 
Cohen Milstein Owes $500,000 in Malpractice Case
Legal Times
August 12, 2008
The five-year-old malpractice suit against Washington, D.C.-based plaintiffs firm Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll concluded Thursday when a D.C. Superior Court jury returned a judgment for one of the plaintiffs to the tune of $500,000. The jury trial lasted nearly four weeks.
Thomas Prousalis Jr. and Gayle Prousalis sued Cohen Milstein, along with partners Herbert Milstein and Lisa Mezzetti, in 2003, alleging the defendants had botched the Prousalises' underlying case against their stockbroker. According to the complaint, Cohen Milstein failed to file witness or exhibit lists in that case, and withdrew as counsel on the morning of an arbitration hearing. As a consequence, the complaint says the Prousalises were forced to abandon their case.
The Prousalises were seeking $25 million in compensatory damages, and $100 million in punitive damages against Cohen Milstein. On Thursday, the jury awarded $500,000 to Gayle Prousalis, but did not find in favor of Thomas Prousalis. Thomas Prousalis, a former Washington lawyer, found himself in trouble with the law shortly after filing the complaint against Cohen Milstein. He pleaded guilty to mail, wire and securities fraud in 2004, and was disbarred in the District of Columbia the same year.
Deborah Vitale, an Alexandria, Va., solo practitioner, represented the Prousalises. Paul Maloney of Carr Maloney represented the defendants. Neither lawyer was immediately available for comment.
First reported in The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times
