Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Testimony: Spitzer Aides' View of Cuomo Guided Probe Tactics

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Testimony: Spitzer Aides' View of Cuomo Guided Probe Tactics

By Joel Stashenko All Articles 

New York Law Journal

August 4, 2008

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Aides to then-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer viewed state Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo's investigation of Spitzer administration efforts to discredit a political rival as overly aggressively and possibly politically motivated, testimony gathered by the state Commission on Public Integrity indicates.

Testimony also indicated that former Spitzer aides told Cuomo's office prior to release of his report in July 2007 that the governor would not embrace its findings if it contained any references to the governor's office not being cooperative with the investigation.

In a version of events disputed by Cuomo's office, the Spitzer aides testified that the attorney general's camp, in turn, wanted Spitzer's statement about the attorney general's report to praise its fairness.

The testimony about the communications between the aides to Spitzer and Cuomo is included in more than 3,000 pages of documents made public by the Public Integrity commission based on its own investigation into actions taken by Spitzer's office against his political rival, state Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno.

The documents also included testimony by Albany attorney Terence Kindlon, who represented former Spitzer communications director Darren Dopp during the late stages of the investigation. Kindlon told the commission that top Spitzer aides were dismayed at how aggressively Cuomo investigated Spitzer's office and frequently made cutting remarks about the attorney general, sometimes in obscene terms.

"There were many, many derogatory things said about Andrew Cuomo and the people working with him and that he wasn't trusted; that ... there was a sense that, you know, he wanted to be governor some day and wanted to destroy Eliot Spitzer," Kindlon testified on Jan. 23.

Kindlon testified that he could not remember specifically which Spitzer aides said what about the attorney general and his staff, except that Dopp was the only Spitzer staffer present who did not criticize Cuomo.

"I do recall Andrew Cuomo being described as an animal," Kindlon said. "That's probably the nicest thing anybody called him."

The mistrust of Cuomo's office helped convince Spitzer administration attorneys not to allow Dopp or Richard Baum, Spitzer's secretary, to testify to the attorney general about their roles in efforts to use State Police to gather travel records thought to be damaging to then-state Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, Kindlon said.

Instead, Spitzer's office provided statements signed by Dopp and Baum to the attorney general describing their role in the Bruno record-gathering operation.

Kindlon, who said he concurred in the decision not to allow Dopp to testify before Cuomo's investigators, described the statement he helped draft for Dopp as "very deliberately designed" to "say next to nothing."

"Well, it was -- you know, it is so to speak was papering the file, a gesture," Kindlon said.

Cuomo did not use the statements in his report, which questioned the record-gathering activities of the police but concluded that no crimes were committed. Cuomo has subsequently begun an investigation into whether the operations of the State Police have been improperly politicized.

The release of Cuomo's report on July 23, 2007, further damaged the already fractured relationship between Spitzer, a Democrat, and the Republican Bruno. The poisonous relationship between the two men persisted through Spitzer's resignation in March 2008 after he was caught by federal authorities patronizing a prostitute.

The Public Integrity commission last month charged Dopp and Preston Felton, the former acting superintendent of State Police, with violations of Public Officers Law for their roles in the travel records affair. Baum and William Howard, Spitzer's former liaison with the State Police, were charged with lower-level violations of the law.

Baum and Howard admitted to the charges and settled with the commission. Dopp and Felton are contesting the allegations.

CUOMO 'VERY AGGRESSIVE'

The testimony released by the commission indicates that Spitzer's policy director Peter Pope and deputy secretary Sean Patrick Maloney advised Dopp and Baum on how to respond to the Cuomo investigation along with the counsel to the governor, David Nocenti.

Nocenti told the commission on Feb. 14 that Cuomo's office "was being very aggressive in their interviewing of witnesses."

Nocenti and Pope both told the commission that they were dismayed when Howard testified under oath before Cuomo's investigators without the approval of the Spitzer administration attorneys. Howard misstated some facts, opening himself up to the possibility of a perjury charge. (See Pope's testimony.)

That experience also weighed against the decision of Spitzer's office not to produce Dopp and Baum for their testimony before Cuomo, both Nocenti and Pope told their commission interviewers, though Dopp, in particular, was eager to appear.

"They [Cuomo investigators] had indicated to us that, you know, any time you have inconsistent testimony, there is always the potential for perjury or a perjury charge, as opposed to just, you know, innocent differences of recollection," Nocenti testified on Feb. 7. "We were specifically told that the Attorney General's office was not doing a perjury investigation, but I believe there may have been some discussion ... of, you know, the practical foibles of going in and testifying."

The Spitzer administration attorneys also said the request for the testimony from Dopp and Baum came late in Cuomo's investigation, after the governor's office had been told by Cuomo's investigators that no criminality would be found.

Once Cuomo's report was nearly complete, Nocenti testified that the Spitzer camp made it clear that it could not embrace the Cuomo report if it contained any references to Spitzer's office failing to cooperate with the investigation. Cuomo's aides, meanwhile, wanted assurances that Dopp and Howard would be disciplined internally.

Cuomo's office also wanted former acting State Police Superintendent Preston Felton disciplined, but Spitzer's office declined, saying he was acting at the direction of Dopp and Howard. Nocenti testified, however, that Felton's activities effectively doomed any chances he had at being confirmed by the Senate as State Police superintendent on a permanent basis.

Felton has since retired.

Cuomo's aides also wanted a statement from Spitzer accepting Cuomo's findings and praising the fairness of the investigation, Nocenti testified.

Those discussions between the aides to the governor and the attorney general occurred on July 22, 2007, the day before Cuomo's report was made public. Cuomo was chiefly represented in the discussions by Ellen Nachtigall Biben, the special deputy attorney general for public integrity, and special counsel Linda A. Lacewell.

"We wanted to know what the report was going to say, sum and substance, including our cooperation," Nocenti testified. "They wanted us to say positive things about the report, including saying that it was fair and accurate, I guess is the best way to describe it."

In that statement, Spitzer said, "I want to thank the Attorney General's Office and the state Inspector General's Office for their efforts and for issuing an expeditious, thorough, professional and fair report."

Cuomo's aides last week denied that any deal making with Spitzer's office altered the content of their report. John Milgrim, Cuomo's spokesman, said it is standard procedure in the attorney general's office to brief the subjects of an investigative report just before their release "to give the parties a chance to tell us if there are any inaccuracies and to avoid unfair surprise."

"Neither Gov. Spitzer's staff nor Sen. Bruno's staff, both of whom were briefed, indicated that there were any inaccuracies in the report," Milgrim said. "Indeed, one year later, it is clear that the findings in the attorney general's report were factually accurate and fair in tone."

Milgrim said it is "not surprising that the governor stated the report was fair and accurate." It was up to the governor what he put in his statement about the investigation, not the attorney general's office, he said.

'TERRIBLY INCOMPLETE' REPORT

Cuomo's report was silent on the matter of cooperation that investigators received from Spitzer's office.

In his May 9 testimony to the Public Integrity commission, Spitzer said he understood Cuomo's office had made the "misguided" request that the governor would make a statement praising a report that Spitzer had not seen.

"We knew that that report was, at a minimum, terribly incomplete, and based upon an incomplete record," Spitzer testified.

The ex-governor said he knew there were conversations between his aides and Cuomo's aides about his statement and the attorney general's report prior to its release, but he testified that he did not know about the substance of the discussions.

Dopp was suspended as communications director and never returned to that post. He now works for an Albany lobbying and public relations firm, Patricia Lynch Associates.

Nocenti told the public integrity commission that Dopp's punishment was ultimately disproportionate to his misconduct.

"In the aftermath of all of this, my view became that he ended up with much worse consequences than he merited," Nocenti said.



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Baum

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • State Police
  • Commission on Public Integrity
  • Public Integrity commission
  • Inspector General
  • Bruno's
  • Patricia Lynch Associates

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Harvard Law Opens Applications to Juniors
    •      
  4. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  5. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Circuit Reinstates Lawsuit by Inmate Over Cell Conditions
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Custody Ruling in Bitter Fight May Turn on 11-Year-Old's Wish
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media