Incisive Media's Law.com
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
Register for Law.com Newswire
Newsletters
RSS

Law.com Home > Scalia Takes to the Stage to Make Case for Better Advocacy

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Scalia Takes to the Stage to Make Case for Better Advocacy

Tony Mauro

Legal Times

July 28, 2008

  • deliciousdel.icio.us
  • digg Digg
  • redditReddit
  • facebookFacebook
  • googleGoogle Bookmarks
  • newsvineNewsvine
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • mixxMixx
  • stumbleuponStumbleupon
  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Before a sizable crowd of lawyers and law students at Kennedy Center's Concert Hall, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and co-author Bryan Garner held forth on Friday in what had to be one of the most unusual continuing legal education courses of all time. They spent their time alternating their way through all 115 "tips" for better advocacy included in their book "Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges."

"I've always wanted to be center stage at the Concert Hall," Scalia said, although he confessed he prefers the adjacent Opera House. Self-effacingly, Scalia said the daylong course was likely to be "the dullest act" the hall had ever hosted, except for atonal music concerts that might have taken place there.

But far from dull, the Scalia-Garner duet was full of funny asides and useful advice. "Lawyers are generally lousy writers," Scalia lamented, advising them to read nonlegal prose and to love language and words. Be concise, Scalia commanded. "You want to acquire a reputation as a lawyer who comes in under the page limit." Any case will have weak points, Scalia said, so if you have to give ground, you might as well impress the judge with your fairness and "concede ostentatiously."

When Garner argued for presenting no more than three points in most legal briefs, Scalia chimed in that three was a very important number in life, as in "three coffee beans in your anisette."

One priceless moment came when it was Scalia's turn to talk about the next tip on the list, which advised lawyers to be prepared to use legislative history in defending their interpretation of statutes. "Why did you give me this one?" Scalia said with mock horror. Scalia, after all, is a die-hard opponent of using legislative history, which he says can be doctored and misused. But Scalia rose to the occasion anyway, acknowledging that some judges think legislative history is valid. If you have to use it, Scalia said, "Do it boldly, as though it makes sense."

 



Subscribe to Legal Times

  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Write to the Editor

Advertisement

Top Stories From Law.com

Legal Technology

  • Public Performance in the Digital Age

Corporate Counsel

  • United Technologies Takes a Stand, Puts Billable Hour 'on Life Support'

Small Firm Business

  • Holiday Parties: Keeping Expenses Low and Deductibility High

Advertisement

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS >>

POST A JOB >>

Advertisement

About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions
Close [ X ]