Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Large Firm
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Technology
    • Washington
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Resume
    • The Careerist Blog
    • News & Views
  • LawCatalog Store
    • Books Online
    • Best-Selling Books
    • Books
    • Directories
    • E-Newsletters
    • Magazines
    • Newspapers
    • Newsletters
    • Surveys
    • Research Services
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
  • email
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • alert
  • rss

Law.com Home > 3rd Circuit Tosses 'Wardrobe Malfunction' Fine Against CBS

Font Size: increase font decrease font

3rd Circuit Tosses 'Wardrobe Malfunction' Fine Against CBS

By Shannon P. Duffy All Articles 

The Legal Intelligencer

July 22, 2008

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Will Fonda's On-Air Blooper Help CBS in the Janet Jackson Case?

A federal appeals court on Monday ruled that the Federal Communications Commission should not have imposed fines on CBS for the infamous "wardrobe malfunction" at the 2004 Super Bowl in which singer Janet Jackson's breast was exposed for a split second because the agency had unfairly imposed a new, stricter standard without first informing broadcasters.

"Like any agency, the FCC may change its policies without judicial second-guessing. But it cannot change a well-established course of action without supplying notice of and a reasoned explanation for its policy departure," Chief 3rd Circuit Judge Anthony J. Scirica wrote in CBS Corp. v. FCC.

The three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was unanimous in finding that the FCC had a long-standing policy of excusing "fleeting" instances of indecency, especially in live broadcasts, and had therefore acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it imposed a fine of $550,000 on CBS.

"In finding CBS liable ... the FCC arbitrarily and capriciously departed from its prior policy excepting fleeting broadcast material from the scope of actionable indecency," Scirica wrote in an opinion joined by Judges Marjorie O. Rendell and Julio M. Fuentes.

The court also rejected the FCC's argument that the more relaxed policy applied only to spoken indecency, and not to indecent images.

"The FCC's present distinction between words and images for purposes of determining indecency represents a departure from its prior policy," Scirica wrote.

Scirica also found that the FCC "cannot impose liability on CBS for the acts of Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake, independent contractors hired for the limited purposes of the halftime show" without proof that the network was aware that the incident was planned.

The ruling marks another setback for the stricter indecency policy the FCC has enforced under Chairman Kevin J. Martin. Last year, the 2nd Circuit struck down FCC rules on so-called "fleeting expletives" stemming from live broadcasts of the Billboard Music Awards in which celebrities uttered the "F-word." The Bush administration appealed and the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear that case in the fall. Media Access Project, who filed an amicus brief on behalf of a group of TV writers, directors and producers, said the ruling "is an important advance for preserving creative freedom on the air."

The Super Bowl ruling is a victory for CBS' appellate team, led by attorney Robert Corn Revere of Davis Wright & Tremaine in Washington, D.C., and Jerome J. Shestack of Wolf Block in Philadelphia.

In a statement, CBS said: "We are gratified by the court's decision, which we hope will lead the FCC to return to the policy of restrained indecency enforcement."

The network said the ruling "is an important win for the entire broadcasting industry because it recognizes that there are rare instances, particularly during live programming, when it may not be possible to block unfortunate fleeting material."

FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin said he was "surprised by today's decision and disappointed for families and parents."

"I continue to believe that this incident was inappropriate, and this only highlights the importance of the Supreme Court's consideration of our indecency rules this fall," he said.

Jackson's breast was exposed for 9/16ths of a second when Timberlake tore open her bustier during a choreographed performance of his song "Rock Your Body" in the halftime show's finale. The incident sparked more than 500,000 complaints to the FCC and the largest fine for a television broadcast at the time.

Attorney Andrew Jay Schwartzman of the

"The court agreed with us: the FCC's inconsistent and unexplained departure from prior decisions leaves artists and journalists confused as to what is, and is not, permissible," Schwartzman said in a statement Monday.

In the opening paragraph of the court's 102-page opinion, Scirica hinted that any blame for the incident was shared by Jackson and Timberlake, saying in his description of the event that "two performers deviated from the show's script resulting in the exposure of a bare female breast on camera, a deceitful and manipulative act that lasted 9/16ths of one second."

Most of Scirica's opinion was devoted to analyzing the FCC's evolving policies on indecency and determining whether the agency had properly warned broadcasters of its intent to begin imposing stricter standards.

Justice Department attorney Eric Miller argued that the agency's restrained policy applied only to fleeting utterances –– specifically, fleeting expletives –– and did not extend to fleeting images.

But Scirica found that "a review of the commission's enforcement history reveals that its policy on fleeting material was never so limited."

Scirica found that the FCC's policy change came when the commissioners overturned a decision by the agency's enforcement bureau that rejected complaints over a 2003 Golden Globes broadcast in which musician Bono said "this is really, really fucking brilliant" while accepting an award.

The enforcement bureau, Scirica said, had "specifically reaffirmed that 'fleeting and isolated remarks' ... do not warrant commission action."

But the full commission reversed the enforcement bureau's decision, Scirica said, and "overruled all of its prior cases holding such instances not actionable."

The FCC said in its ruling that it recognized that some of its prior decisions "have indicated that isolated or fleeting broadcasts of the 'F-Word' ... are not indecent or would not be acted upon." Reversing that position, the agency said that "consistent with our decision today we conclude that any such interpretation is no longer good law."

Broadcasters challenged the Golden Globes ruling, Scirica noted, and the FCC in 2006 issued an "omnibus order" that declared four broadcasts "indecent and profane," including two consecutive airings of the Billboard Music Awards in which Cher and Nicole Richie used unscripted expletives; an episode of "NYPD Blue" in which characters used scripted expletives; and a CBS broadcast of "The Early Show," in which a guest used an unscripted expletive during a live interview.

But the ruling imposed no fines, Scirica noted, because the FCC made clear that it had no intention of imposing fines on broadcasters for incidents that took place prior to the new policy.

The Super Bowl case occurred before the omnibus order, Scirica said, but the FCC took the position that its new policy reflected changes only on spoken indecency, and that CBS should have been aware that it was potentially liable for the broadcast of indecent images, even if fleeting.

Scirica disagreed, saying "even if, as the FCC contends, Golden Globes only addressed expletives, it nevertheless represented the first time the commission distinguished between formats of broadcast material or singled out any one category of material for special treatment under its fleeting material policy."

In doing so, Scirica said, the commissioners "altered the scope of the FCC's fleeting material policy by excising only one category of fleeting material –– fleeting expletives –– from the policy."

As a result, Scirica concluded that the FCC's ruling in the Janet Jackson case marked another change in policy.

"By targeting another category of fleeting material –– fleeting images –– in its orders against CBS in this case, the FCC apparently sought to further narrow or eliminate the fleeting material policy as it existed following Golden Globes," Scirica wrote.

Therefore, Scirica said, the FCC's decision that a split-second "glimpse of a bare female breast" was actionably indecent amounted to the "announcement of a policy change –– that fleeting images would no longer be excluded from the scope of actionable indecency."

The FCC's lawyer insisted that it "never had a policy of excluding fleeting images from the scope of actionable indecency."

Scirica disagreed, saying "the balance of the evidence weighs heavily against the FCC's contention."

Instead, Scirica said, an extensive review of all the FCC indecency rulings showed that "the commission's exception for fleeting material ... treated images and words alike. Three decades of FCC action support this conclusion."

Under the law, Scirica said, the FCC must always "supply a reasoned explanation for its departure from prior policy."

But since the FCC was refusing to acknowledge that its policy had changed, Scirica said, it had failed to comply with that requirement, and the new policy therefore must be declared "arbitrary and capricious" and "invalid as applied to CBS."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Davis Wright Tremaine
  • WolfBlock

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • CBS Corp.
  • U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • 2nd Circuit
  • Davis Wright & Tremaine
  • Justice Department
  • Associated Press

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  4. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Three Strategies for Reducing Class Action Costs

Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Tech Circuit: LegalTech West Coast Edition

Silicon Startups

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Law.com Network
  • ADVERTISE

law.com

  • Tour the New Site
  • Newswire
  • Special Reports
  • International News
  • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
  • Legal Blogs
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Site Map

alm national

  • The American Lawyer
  • The Am Law Litigation Daily
  • Corporate Counsel
  • Law Technology News
  • The National Law Journal

alm regional

  • Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Daily Business Review (FL)
  • Delaware Law Weekly
  • Daily Report (GA)
  • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
  • New Jersey Law Journal
  • New York Law Journal
  • GC New York
  • The Recorder (CA)
  • Texas Lawyer
  • The Asian Lawyer
  • Focus Europe

directories

  • ALM Experts
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
  • Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Legal Recruiter's Directory
  • Corporate Counsel Top Rated Lawyers
  • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
  • National Directory of Minority Attorneys
  • Go-To Law firms of the Top 500 Companies

books & newsletters

  • Best-Selling Books
  • Publication E-Alerts
  • Law Journal Newsletters
  • LawCatalog Store
  • Law Journal Press Online

research

  • ALM Legal Intelligence
  • Court Reporters
  • MA 3000
  • Verdict Search
  • ALM Experts
  • Legal Dictionary
  • Smart Litigator

events & conferences

  • ALM Events
  • LegalTech®
  • Virtual LegalTech®
  • Virtual Events
  • Webinars & Online Events
  • Insight Information

reprints

  • Reprints

online cle

  • CLE Center

career

  • Lawjobs
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions |  ALM User License Agreement