Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Hedge Funds Claim Victory in CSX Battle

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Hedge Funds Claim Victory in CSX Battle

By Susan Beck All Articles 

The American Lawyer

July 17, 2008

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The history of playground fights and corporate takeovers shows that winners don't have to play nice.

Add another chapter to that book with the announcement Wednesday that two activist hedge funds, represented by Schulte Roth & Zabel and Kirkland & Ellis, succeeded in getting four of their five nominees elected to CSX Corp.'s 12-person board. (The vote was held at the company's June 25 annual meeting, but the preliminary results were not announced until Wednesday.)

Last month those funds had been verbally bludgeoned by Manhattan federal district Judge Lewis Kaplan for their aggressive tactics in the takeover battle for railroad company CSX. Kaplan berated the funds -- The Children's Investment Fund (TCI) and 3G Capital Partners Ltd. -- for "crossing the line" dividing legal from illegal activity and then using "formalistic arguments" to justify their bad acts.

In this case of first impression, Kaplan disapproved of the funds' tactic of hiding huge positions they had taken in CSX by using derivative swaps.

CSX, represented by Rory Millson and Francis Barron of Cravath, Swaine & Moore, had sued the funds to try to stop them from voting the shares that they acquired through positions called "total return equity swaps." Cravath claimed the funds had violated the Williams Act, which governs takeovers, by failing to make a public disclosure of these swaps. The swaps allowed the funds to control large blocks of CSX stock without actually owning the stock.

The defendants countered that they didn't have to make any disclosure until they converted these swaps into more than 5 percent of CSX's stock.

British fund TCI is represented by Howard Godnick of Schulte Roth; 3G, a Cayman Island firm, is advised by Kirkland's Peter Doyle.

The funds were able to proceed with their proxy fight because Judge Kaplan regretfully concluded that despite the defendants' wrongdoing, he did not have the power to stop them from voting their shares. Only the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Justice Department could do that. In the end, he simply ordered an injunction barring them from violating the law in the future.

"We're pleased with the result that the shareholders have chosen to elect four members of our slate and ensure CSX can be the best train company in America," Schulte Roth's Godnick told the AmLaw Daily. Cravath's Barron declined to comment.

CSX hasn't given up, though. The company is appealing the remedy portion of Kaplan's decision to the 2nd Circuit.

The hedge funds are appealing other aspects of the ruling. In their brief, they object to Kaplan's ruling that swap ownership confers beneficial stock ownership.

Oral arguments are set for July 25.

 



Subscribe to The American Lawyer

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Cravath, Swaine & Moore
  • Schulte Roth & Zabel

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • CSX Corp.
  • Kirkland & Ellis
  • Investment Fund
  • Capital Partners Ltd.
  • Cravath Swaine & Moore
  • Kirkland's
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Justice Department
  • 2nd Circuit

Key categories

    
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Securities

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  4. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
  5. New Orrick Leader Adds to Team with CMO from Shearman
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media