Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Federal Judge Upholds 'Passenger Bill of Rights'

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Federal Judge Upholds 'Passenger Bill of Rights'

By Joel Stashenko All Articles 

New York Law Journal

December 21, 2007

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A federal judge Thursday dismissed a challenge to a new state law requiring more humane treatment for passengers stuck on planes that have been grounded for more than three hours by bad weather or for other reasons.

Northern District of New York Court Judge Lawrence E. Kahn held that the new law, called the Passenger Bill of Rights by its legislative sponsors, is not pre-empted by the federal Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, as a group representing major U.S. passenger and cargo airlines contend.

The pre-emption clause of the federal act, 49 U.S.C. §41713(b)(1), prohibits states from creating laws "related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier." Kahn held that the state law, which would require that passengers be given water, fresh air and working toilets if delays stretch past three hours, affects neither an airline's "price," "route" nor "service."

It is a legitimate use of state police power to protect the health and safety of its citizens, the judge held in Air Transport Association of America v. Cuomo, 1:07-cv-1103.

"The Passenger Bill of Rights is an exercise in state protection of the public health," ruled Kahn, who heard oral arguments in the case Tuesday. "Fresh air, water, sanitation and food are necessities in the extreme situation in which this act applies; it threatens the public health to contain people on grounded airplanes for hours without these necessities, particularly, though not exclusively, if passengers include diabetics, young children, the sick or the frail."

Kahn denied the motion by the Air Transport Association (ATA) for summary judgment or a preliminary injunction to prevent the state law from taking effect on Jan. 1, 2008. And though the judge noted that the state did not ask for summary judgment dismissing the airlines' complaint, he was granting it anyway.

"Because summary judgment for the state is appropriate as a matter of law, granting such relief at this time serves the goal of judicial efficiency and is clearly within the authority of the Court," the judge wrote.

The legislation creating the law, (A8406B/S5050C), was drawn up in response to the lengthy delays due to winter storms endured earlier this year by passengers in New York City-area airports on Valentine's Day and St. Patrick's Day. Rather than return to the terminals, several airlines kept passengers on board and planes on the runway in hopes that breaks in the weather would allow the planes to take off.

Some passengers were confined for 10 hours or more.

In addition to requiring airlines to give passengers on flights grounded for more than three hours water, fresh air and working toilets, the law also creates an advocate for airline passengers within the Consumer Protection Board and empowers the state attorney general to seek civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation per passenger.

The Air Transport Association said it may appeal Kahn's ruling.

"ATA believes that the Court has misinterpreted the law," a statement from the association said. "We will consider our options, including filing an appeal. ATA's sole purpose in filing this lawsuit was to preserve the principle that commercial aviation is best regulated by one source -- the federal government -- and not 50 individual states."

The legislative sponsors of the act praised Kahn's ruling.

Sen. Charles J. Fuschillo, R-Freeport, said in an interview, "This is the right law to protect consumers who pay a lot of money to fly on airlines. They should be treated better."

Assemblyman Michael N. Gianaris, D-Queens, said, "That's about as good as it gets. A shot has been fired in support of the flying public throughout this country. Judge Kahn deserves enormous credit for standing up to an industry that has spent countless dollars to defeat the rights of passengers to be treated like human beings."

The Washington, D.C.-based Air Transport Association of America represents airlines carrying more than 90 percent of the passenger and cargo traffic in the country. It said its member airlines operate more than 6,000 departing flights daily at nine airports in New York state.

New York's Passenger Bill of Rights is the first state law of its kind in the nation, according to the Air Transport Association.



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Air Transport Association of America
  • ATA'
  • A8406B/S5050C
  • Consumer Protection Board

Key categories

    
  • laws
  • prices
  • consumer issue
  • consumers
  • litigation
  • local authority
  • lawyer
  • air transport
  • consumer issue
  • judiciary (system of justice)

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  4. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Circuit Reinstates Lawsuit by Inmate Over Cell Conditions
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Custody Ruling in Bitter Fight May Turn on 11-Year-Old's Wish
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media