More than once recently, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has said that one of his goals is to achieve greater unanimity on the Supreme Court -- even if it means deciding cases narrowly. But last week it became clear that the Court is not even unanimous on whether Roberts' goal is realistic or worth pursuing. During a public debate, Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer both sounded dubious. "There are a lot of good reasons for narrow opinions, but one of them is not to get nine votes," Scalia said.
Scalia, Breyer Debate Unanimity on the High Court
December 13, 2006
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Law.com. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.