Although the attractive nuisance theory of liability is most often applied to young children who suffer injuries while trespassing, a Pennsylvania federal judge has ruled that it may be used by two 17-year-old boys who suffered serious burns when they climbed atop a parked railroad car. Judge Lawrence F. Stengel wrote that the plaintiffs presented "evidence that 17-year-old males generally do not have fully mature brains, and as such cannot fully control their impulses or appreciate some risks."
17-Year-Old Trespassers May Use Attractive Nuisance Argument
The Legal Intelligencer
April 11, 2006
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Law.com. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.