A Pennsylvania federal judge has refused to overturn a $7.9 million verdict in an insurance bad faith case brought on behalf of a doctor who claimed that his insurer's failure to offer the limits of his policy led to a $2.5 million malpractice verdict against him. The judge rejected the insurer's argument that the jury's award of $6.25 million in punitive damages was unjustified and excessive. The ruling upholds what appears to be the largest insurance bad faith verdict ever handed up in the state.
$7.9M Bad Faith Verdict Upheld by Pa. Federal Judge
The Legal Intelligencer
March 31, 2006
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Law.com. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.