Ninth Circuit Judge Carlos Bea submitted a 40-page dissent countering what he called a "misguided" reversal of a murder conviction. The majority found the defendant should have been appointed a new lawyer after a series of conflicts with public defenders. Bea wrote that by allowing the defendant's distrust of his appointed attorneys to require a change of counsel, "the majority sets forth a rudderless, subjective rule for finding an 'irreconcilable conflict' between a criminal defendant and his counsel."
9th Circuit Reversal of Murder Conviction Prompts Colorful Dissent
October 20, 2005
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Law.com. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.