Lani Guinier uses the reasoning and language of the dissenters in the 6th Circuit's Grutter v. Bollinger decision and the University of Michigan Law School's mission statement as a prism through which to identify and evaluate the complexity of race as a concept and as a criterion for admission. Guinier further notes that the all-important LSAT is a far better indicator of privilege than a predictor of success.
Font Size: 
The Pigment Perplex
The American Lawyer
August 12, 2002
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Law.com. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
