X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Since 2010, Pension Committee v. Banc of America Securities  has been a premier decision on the availability of adverse inference sanctions where a party fails to issue a litigation hold. U.S. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin held that a party’s failure to institute a written hold was “gross negligence” per se, permitting a presumption that relevant and prejudicial documents were destroyed and triggering the dreaded adverse inference against the erring party. Recognizing Judge Scheindlin’s expertise and reputation in e-discovery, extending from her multiple decisions in the famous Zubulake v. Warburg cases through her five opinions in National Day Laborer Organization Network v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which applied e-discovery standards to FOIA requests, Pension Committee became the benchmark on litigation hold sanctions. According to a recent Westlaw search, courts have cited it in 91 cases, with only two directly criticizing its holding.

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2017 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.