Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Ravens Logo IP Case Splits Down the Middle

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Ravens Logo IP Case Splits Down the Middle

One jury found that the Baltimore Ravens infringed on a logo sketched by a fan. Another jury found that the Ravens didn't owe the fan anything. That's why they're still in court today.

By Ross Todd Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

March 22, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
ravens_flyingb
flyingb_sketch

In February the Baltimore Ravens were able to hold off the San Francisco 49ers to pull out a nail-biting victory in Super Bowl XLVII­—the team's second championship in its 17-season history. But after more than a decade and a half of litigation, the team still hasn't finished off its peskiest rival, Baltimore native and dedicated doodler Fred Bouchat.

Bouchat started sketching ideas for the team's logo soon after the owner of the Cleveland Browns announced in the fall of 1995 that his franchise would be moving to Baltimore. Bouchat, who worked as a security guard in a Baltimore office building at the time, showed his sketches to anyone who would look at them, and faxed the drawings to an official at the Maryland Stadium Authority for the team's consideration.

Bouchat never heard from the team. But when the Ravens' new logo first appeared in the local newspaper, he immediately noticed that the "Flying B" design looked almost exactly like one of the designs that he had eagerly shown around. Bouchat hired Baltimore lawyer Howard Schulman, who first copyrighted his client's designs, and then filed an infringement suit against the Ravens and the National Football League in 1997.

U.S. District Judge Marvin Garbis, who still presides over the litigation to this day, bifurcated Bouchat's suit into separate trials on infringement and damages. In 1998 a jury found the NFL and Ravens guilty of infringement. According to the jurors, Bouchat's designs had somehow entered into the flow of documents used by the league's in-house artists. But in 2002 a different jury decided that despite the infringement, the Ravens and the NFL didn't owe Bouchat any dam­ages, because the profits from merchandise and souvenirs with the Flying B logo were due to the team's marketing efforts rather than Bouchat's artistic input.

The conflicting jury verdicts have resulted in the litigation equivalent of trench warfare. Armed with the infringement finding, Bouchat and Schulman have repeatedly sued the league, the team, and their business partners practically anytime the old Flying B logo pops up—be it in a stadium photo display, a highlight reel, or a video game. Meanwhile, the Ravens and the NFL, backed by the $0 damages finding, have yet to pay Bouchat a penny.

As the fight has dragged on, the potential recovery has plummeted and the legal bills have soared. Schulman says that his client's case "is being funded by my lack of business judgment." Lawyers for the NFL declined to say how much its defense has cost, but the league has consistently hired talent from top-dollar firms, including Hogan & Hartson (now Hogan Lovells), White & Case, and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.

In an interview this winter, Schulman argued that an injunction barring the NFL and its partners from using the Flying B logo would be the best solution at this point. "Our message is very simple: Stop using it," Schulman says. "Let the market forces operate. If they want to pay whatever Mr. Bouchat is willing to take [to use it], then fine."

NFL defense counsel Robert Raskopf has countered that it's Bouchat who's been dragging the case out, by suing anyone who's ever used the Ravens' first logo in any context. "If there's a discernible Flying B—no matter how incidental, inconsequential, historical, noncommercial, educational, unexploited, important, factual—we will see it in a lawsuit," Raskopf said at a hearing before Garbis this past October. Raskopf has argued for the NFL in more hearings in the Bouchat litigation than anyone else, first as a partner at White & Case and, since 2006, as a partner at Quinn Emanuel. "The NFL has moved on," Raskopf added at the hearing.

Few IP practitioners will ever face a copyright case as peculiar as this one, given its twists and turns and the bizarre set of underlying facts. But Mark McKenna, a professor at the University of Notre Dame Law School who has written extensively about sports logo licensing, says that Bouchat's suit offers a lesson about the nature of litigation. "People sometimes act irrationally because they get stuck on what the outcome should be," McKenna says. Some contests, it seems, grow too heated to end with the rivals shaking hands.

Maryland's biggest city was left without an NFL franchise after the once-beloved Baltimore Colts left for Indianapolis in 1984. Fans felt jilted by the Colts, who hauled away their belongings in Mayflower moving vans early one snowy March morning.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Hogan & Hartson
  • Hogan Lovells
  • Patton Boggs
  • Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
  • White & Case

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • the Madden NFL
  • Fourth Circuit
  • Colts
  • Flying B.
  • NFL Properties
  • Maryland Stadium Authority
  • U.S. Copyright Office
  • George Beall and White & Case
  • NFL Enterprises
  • Department of Labor
  • Green Bay Packers
  • Washington Redskins
  • Baltimore Sun Company
  • Champion Products Inc.
  • Baltimore Ravens
  • Dallas Cowboys
  • National Football League
  • Cleveland Browns
  • University of Notre Dame
  • Electronic Arts, Inc.
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Local Government
  • Litigation

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Safeguarding Brand Reputation In Social Media
    •      
  2. What to Look for in a Board's Risk Director
    •      
  3. Patent Board's SAP Ruling is First Under New AIA Rules
    •      
  4. Are GCs More Than Just Legally Trained Executives?
    •      
  5. Another SEC Whistleblower, More On the Way
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media