Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > March Madness Can Be Problematic For Employers

Font Size: increase font decrease font

March Madness Can Be Problematic For Employers

By Lisa A. McGlynn All Articles 

Daily Business Review

March 13, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
© Flavio Marinoni ? Fotolia.com

© Flavio Marinoni ? Fotolia.com

March Madness is here again. The brackets, the excitement, the employment law issues! Yes, many employers find that the annual NCAA basketball tournament goes hand-in-hand with employment law because, unfortunately, one of the most exciting sporting events of the year can also be the most problematic for employers.

Unlike other major sporting events such as the Super Bowl, which takes place on a single Sunday evening, March Madness lasts for weeks and roughly half of the games are played during traditional work hours. Studies have shown a huge drop in productivity during March Madness as employees tune in to watch games, check scores or research teams for their brackets on their computers and smart phones.

Last year, outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc. predicted that March Madness would attract more than 2.5 million people daily who would each spend an average of 90 minutes watching games. Taking into account the average private-sector hourly wage, Challenger estimated that employers would end up paying distracted workers about $175 million over the first two full days of the tournament alone.

While these numbers are debated, enough workers are watching games from their offices that CBS now provides the Boss Button, which can be clicked to instantly remove audio and video should a manager approach. And, besides the general lack of productivity, employees who stream games on their computers can cause a company's entire network to slow.

Another potential source of concern for employers is office pools. These pools often spring up with either the expressed or implied — by not shutting the pool down — consent of employers whose employees bet on the outcome of games and on the tournament's champion. Regardless of the fact that some might consider these pools to be long standing tradition, gambling unquestionably runs afoul of Florida law.

While some other states have created exceptions to the gambling laws for office sports pools, Florida has not. Florida's law defines gambling of any kind as a second-degree misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to 60 days and a $500 fine. Although Florida's gambling law might not be vigorously enforced, it does remain in effect.

Further, employers who allow office pools could potentially be viewed as condoning the illegal behavior of their employees. Even worse, managers who actively encourage employees to join office pools could be accused of coercing others to gamble.

Equally important, turning a blind eye toward illegal activity such as gambling could potentially undermine other rules of behavior, such as prohibitions on sexual harassment or workplace violence, that must always be strenuously enforced. Laxity in enforcement of workplace policies could prove to be a dangerously slippery slope. Allowing gambling could also impact employees who may have addiction issues.

The news is not all bad for employers. March Madness festivities can help improve camaraderie in the work place. A recent survey by OfficeTeam found that one in five managers believes March Madness pools boost office morale.

Companies can focus on increasing morale and camaraderie, and decreasing legal issues, by establishing an office pool with no entry fee or by placing a television in the lunch room to allow workers to catch up on scores during their break times rather than at their desks.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to Daily Business Review

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Fisher & Phillips

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Daily Business
  • Challenger Gray & Christmas Inc.
  • Officeteam
  • CBS Corporation
  • NCAA

Key categories

    
  • Labor and Employment Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Safeguarding Brand Reputation In Social Media
    •      
  2. Patent Board's SAP Ruling is First Under New AIA Rules
    •      
  3. Another SEC Whistleblower, More On the Way
    •      
  4. What to Look for in a Board's Risk Director
    •      
  5. Are GCs More Than Just Legally Trained Executives?
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media