Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Prevent Employee Theft of Your Retired IT Equipment

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2

Prevent Employee Theft of Your Retired IT Equipment

March 12, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

WIPE EARLY

Theft of retired equipment doesn't have to be catastrophic, but theft of retired equipment that contains confidential data can drain budgets, deplete good will, and tarnish reputations. Assign an employee to ensure all data is removed from a device as soon as it has been identified for disposition using multiple-wipe software that has been proven to fully destroy data on a disk. Nonworking drives should be removed and physically destroyed using a hard drive crusher or even drill. Data destruction should be documented. The longer retired equipment is allowed to linger, the greater the chances that valuable data could end up in the wrong hands.

In all cases, it is wise to destroy data before equipment leaves your facility. A driver could steal a computer causing millions of dollars in damage to your organization. Should a computer be stolen or lost during transit, the transportation carrier might accept responsibility. Unfortunately, that would be a hollow victory, as the Carmack Amendment allows carriers to limit their liability for loss or damage to goods, regardless of how valuable it might be.

VERIFY POSSESSION

Ultimately, retired equipment should be handled by a qualified IT asset disposal vendor. You can outsource recycling, but not responsibility. If you think a pretty certificate will protect you, think again. Compliance and indemnification require unimpeachable chain-of-custody evidence. It is important to remember that unless you prove a vendor has your equipment, there is legal exposure. Disposal tags can protect that vulnerability by deterring employee theft and establishing chain-of-custody with a disposal vendor.

So why not ask a vendor, who is handling the equipment anyway, to also wipe data from the hard drives? You should. However, this should not be the primary method of data destruction. A vendor's data destruction services should be considered a secondary precaution. While it might sound appealing to ask a recycler to destroy data, no vendor can wipe data from a hard drive it never received.

CONCLUSION

Until a device is completely clear of all company data and verified to be in the custody of a qualified vendor, it is still just as important as it was while the device was in use. Companies spend large sums of money creating firewalls and encryption to protect sensitive business data, so why do companies treat retired equipment so carelessly?

By instituting policies that safeguard all of your equipment, you can ensure your sensitive data is safe from the time a computer is deployed until the day it is retired. With a little guidance, IT staff will likely work with you to keep your data safe.

Kyle Marks is the Founder and CEO of Retire-IT. Marks serves as the chairman of the Asset Disposal & Information Security Alliance North American Advisory Council and is also a Certified Hardware Asset Manager Professional (CHAMP) from the International Association of Information Technology Asset Managers.

This article originally appeared in Law Technology News.

Previous

  • 1
  • 2


Subscribe to Law Technology News

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • AND POST POLICIES While
  • Information Technology Asset Managers
  • MULTIPLE EMPLOYEES
  • Tricare
  • Office of Civil Rights
  • International Association
  • Asset Disposal & Information Security Alliance North American Advisory Council
  • ACCESS Store
  • US District Court
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services

Key categories

    
  • Technology

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  2. 6 Things In-House Counsel Must Know About E-Discovery
    •      
  3. 3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?
    •      
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb: The Caped Crusaders
    •      
  5. U.S. Legal System Ranked as Most Costly
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Parties Ordered to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media