Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Lady Gaga Promoter Sues to Collect Terrorism Insurance

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Lady Gaga Promoter Sues to Collect Terrorism Insurance

By Amanda Bronstad Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

March 7, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Lady Gaga

Lady Gaga
Photo: Yne Van De Mergel, Wikimedia Commons

Concert promoter Live Nation has sued syndicates of insurer Lloyd's of London for their "despicable conduct" in refusing to cover losses stemming from a performance by Lady Gaga in Indonesia that was canceled last year after the pop star received threats from an Islamic terrorist group.

In the suit, filed in federal court in Los Angeles on March 1, a Live Nation Entertainment Inc. subsidiary cited a "substantial premium" it paid for terrorism insurance, which covered the period from April 19, 2012, through March 17, 2013.

"The Plaintiffs have suffered significant damages as a result of the cancellation of the Lady Gaga concert in Jakarta, Indonesia, because of threats of violence, bodily injury and damage directed against Lady Gaga and others for political, religious, ideological or similar purposes," the complaint says. "The Insurers' denial of coverage under The Terrorism Policies was unreasonable, without proper cause and in bad faith."

Lady Gaga, whose real name is Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, was scheduled to perform the concert in Jakarta on June 3, 2012, but, starting on May 14, Islamic extremists threatened to block her entrance into the city or disrupt the show. In particular, a group called Islamic Defenders Front said it would dispatch 30,000 of its members to block Lady Gaga from entering Jakarta.

Local and national police raised concerns that they could not provide the security needed to protect the singer. The show was canceled on May 17.

The suit, for breach of contract, was filed against three Lloyd's of London syndicates by concert promoter Live Nation LGTours, based in Beverly Hills, Calif.; professional services firm Mermaid Touring Inc. of Los Angeles; and The Atom Factory, an artist management company in Los Angeles. The suit, which seeks unspecified punitive damages, claims that the denial of coverage was "despicable conduct" in "conscious disregard of the Plaintiffs' rights and with the intent to vex, injure or annoy the Plaintiffs."

Live Nation attorney Paul Langer, a partner at Proskauer Rose in Chicago, declined to comment. A Lloyd's of London spokesman said the market does not comment on individual policies or claims but issued a statement: "The Lloyd's insurance market always seeks to settle valid claims as quickly as possible."

The canceled concert was part of Lady Gaga's global Born This Way tour. On February 13, the singer canceled the remaining concerts on the tour—all in the United States—due to an injured hip.

This article originally appeared in The National Law Journal.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Proskauer Rose

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Islamic Defenders Front
  • Mermaid Touring Inc. of Los Angeles
  • Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
  • Lloyds of London

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
  4. Cloud Computing and Unexpected FCPA Jurisdiction
    •      
  5. Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do it Right
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media