Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Reading, Writing, and Regulation in Online Education

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Reading, Writing, and Regulation in Online Education

By Sue Reisinger Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

February 25, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
online_ed

© Jazzerup ? Fotolia.com

Stanford University professor Daphne Koller believes that the next Albert Einstein may be sitting in an African village, without access to college classrooms. Koller also believes that education is a fundamental human right. So she and other pioneering pedagogues are taking university courses into global classrooms online.

Last April, Koller cofounded a free online site called Coursera.org, which offers 213 courses from 33 top universities. At press time it was already reaching more than 2.3 million enrollees (and was growing by about 70,000 per week).

Course offerings run the gamut from biology to computer science, health to economics, education to film. Pupils can learn how to build an information risk management toolkit with professor Barbara Endicott-Popovsky of the University of Washington; explore the galaxies with cosmologist S. George Djorgovski of the California Institute of Technology; or search for extraterrestrial life with astrobiologist Charles Cockell of the University of Edinburgh.

And Coursera isn't alone. There are other sites offering college courses, such as Udacity, cofounded by a former Stanford professor who says he used to teach 200 students per class and now aspires to teach 200,000; and edX, which was formed by Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and now has four more universities on board. These three offer so-called massive open online courses, or MOOCs. Some individual schools offer regular courses with more limited enrollment.

With all those classes go a host of legal challenges. Some of these already exist in traditional education, such as protecting the intellectual property rights in course materials. But other legal issues relate to new technology and the Web. For example: How do you navigate regulatory requirements that differ from state to state and country to country? And how does your legal team keep up with legal challenges that accompany ever-changing technology and mushrooming online enrollment?

Koller, a computer science expert, admits that the law is not her forte. But she already had a brush with it last October, when Minnesota's Office of Higher Education said that Coursera.org did not have permission to teach in that state. "Minnesota's regulation was written 15 or 20 years ago to protect residents from low-quality, high-cost providers and predatory practices," Koller explains. "The problem was the fact that it was applied to free online courses from top universities." A huge public backlash convinced Minnesota officials to back down and allow Coursera to continue its offerings in that state.

Her other legal issues have been more routine. She uses different outside counsel to handle different aspects. She used one to create the company last April, uses another for IP, and uses still others to negotiate agreements and licensing deals with university partners.

The legal world can grow even more complicated when the website charges a fee and offers course credit. Ian Pilarczyk, who directs Boston University School of Law's international business law program online, knows firsthand. From the outset of developing online programs, it's imperative to create clear IP policies, he advises: "Intellectual property is one of the thorniest issues with which universities have to contend."

Pilarczyk explains some of the complications. Under some models the instructor retains ownership of the syllabus and course materials that she has created, just as in traditional teaching. But sometimes the university may reuse or revamp materials or use new instructors. In those cases, Pilarczyk notes, the school may hold a license, or instructors will grant it long-term or permanent rights. "I think that generally faculty are paid for both course development as well as teaching," he adds.

The IP questions are "incredibly complicated," agrees Richard Matasar, a vice president at New York University who oversees its online projects. Exactly who owns the material for NYU's hundreds of course offerings varies, he says. And material obtained elsewhere requires the university "to go through classic patent and copyright deals."

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Dow Lohnes

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Office of Higher Education
  • New York University
  • Boston University School
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
  • Harvard University
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Washington
  • Stanford University
  • California Institute of Technology
  • United States Department of Education

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Education Law
  • Executive Agencies
  • Internet and Technology Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. What to Look for in a Board's Risk Director
    •      
  2. Big Changes at the Company? Expect Employee Misconduct
    •      
  3. Are GCs More Than Just Legally Trained Executives?
    •      
  4. Patent Board's SAP Ruling is First Under New AIA Rules
    •      
  5. Google, Facebook, Microsoft Talk Surveillance
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Corporate Cyberattacks Come Out of the Shadows

Minority-Owned Firm Makes Microsoft's Premier List

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Sets Down Procedure for Discovery in Child Porn Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fixes Urged for Jury Questions in Complex Medical Malpractice Suits

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

NYLJ 100

Circuit Orders Return of Child to Singapore
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement

Senate Mulling Bill Aimed at Redefining Child Abuse

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice

Kia Case To Put New Open Records Act To Test
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media