Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > A 'Smarter' Business Development Model for the Legal Industry

Font Size: increase font decrease font

A 'Smarter' Business Development Model for the Legal Industry

An ex-GC on how law firms can attract business. Hint: It involves more than canapés.

By Aric Press Contact All Articles 

The American Lawyer

February 11, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Image: Jason Doiy

Trevor Faure has looked at law firm business development from both sides. As European general counsel at Tyco and then Ernst & Young's global general counsel, he received countless undifferentiated white papers, an abundance of after-the-fact notices that he'd just been sued, and too many invitations to sup from bottomless law-firm sponsored canapé trays. Not a churlish sort, he appreciated the gestures—who, if they had the time, wouldn't like a day inside the Royal Enclosure at Ascot or on the back nine at Pine Valley?

But he didn't have the time. What he had was a job, and what he needed was help getting it done, rather than more invitations to parties that taxed his wardrobe. All of which led him, a few years back, to walk away from what he saw as the zero-sum law firm–client relationship and turn instead to, excuse the cliché, a "win-win" formulation. This became what he called the Smarter Legal Model (see here and here), an approach that emphasizes mutually beneficial behavior by clients and firms aimed at solving pressing problems. A Smarter Model example: A company asks its litigation firm to examine patterns of claims, and then rewards it for helping cure the underlying problems and avoid further suits.

Eventually Faure moved up in the E&Y empire. He's now its global leader for legal services, which, in part, is a customer-facing job, helping focus E&Y's business and risk management services for lawyers and legal departments. In that role he's looked at law firm business development and concluded that in an age when loyalties were withering under the pressures of globalization, budget tightening, and, to make a Biblical allusion, new Pharaohs who don't know Old Josephs, a business development regimen based on indigestible client alerts and passed hors d'oeuvres was inadequate. Now he's tinkering with a Smarter Business Development Model, a first draft of which he unveiled in January at the annual Marketing Partners Forum.

To oversimplify his views, he sees law firms as needing to embrace six traits, some of which parallel the efforts of the mighty marketing groups at the Big Four accounting firms. Three are attitudinal:

  • Everyone is a client, "even if they haven't instructed us yet."
  • Business development needs to be intensely pursued; at the firm, everyone is in BD.
  • The relationship is about the client, not the firm.
  • And three are substantive:
  • BD is not a department, "it is a discipline along with every other expertise in the firm." It can be taught—and learned.
  • Business grows out of knowledge, both technical and industry-specific.
  • Accounts need to be managed. At the start of every assignment, firms ask clients for specific expectations. At the end of every assignment, firms ask clients for assessments. More work will follow.

Some firms have embraced these ideas. Others are frustrated by a combination of unrealistic expectations coupled with inadequate efforts.

To Faure, it doesn't have to be this way. He says that clients really want just four things from firms: 1. An understanding of their company and industry; 2. The ability to anticipate problems and suggest answers; 3. Quality execution, including after-action assessments; and 4. Cost efficiency. Knowing that, what might a law firm do when, say, the United Kingdom adopts a new and imprecise statute on extraterritorial bribery? How does that become a business development opportunity?

Four steps: First, the firm would examine the law and come to some conclusions about what it might mean. Second, the firm would review the publicly available codes of corporate conduct of firm clients and potential clients. Third, after both reviews were complete, the firm's lead expert would tailor a letter to each general counsel showing specific implementation options rather than issuing a generic, one-solution-fits-all legal bulletin. Then comes patience: The firm waits to be invited to discuss the substance of its message and perhaps a formal assignment.

There are dozens of ways, in Faure's terms, for firms to show prescience and execution. As best as I can tell, that's the easy part. What's harder is getting serious about BD. But without that commitment, even smart law firms will be Dumb Business Developers.

This article originally appeared in The American Lawyer.

 

This article originally appeared in The American Lawyer under the headline “Now, a "Smarter" BD Model.”



Subscribe to The American Lawyer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Smarter Business Development Model
  • Smarter Legal Model
  • Marketing Partners Forum
  • Royal Enclosure
  • Tyco International Limited
  • Ernst & Young s.r.o.

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. What to Look for in a Board's Risk Director
    •      
  2. Big Changes at the Company? Expect Employee Misconduct
    •      
  3. Are GCs More Than Just Legally Trained Executives?
    •      
  4. Patent Board's SAP Ruling is First Under New AIA Rules
    •      
  5. Google, Facebook, Microsoft Talk Surveillance
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Corporate Cyberattacks Come Out of the Shadows

Minority-Owned Firm Makes Microsoft's Premier List

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Sets Down Procedure for Discovery in Child Porn Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fixes Urged for Jury Questions in Complex Medical Malpractice Suits

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

NYLJ 100

Circuit Orders Return of Child to Singapore
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement

Senate Mulling Bill Aimed at Redefining Child Abuse

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice

Kia Case To Put New Open Records Act To Test
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media