Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Spotting and Handling Key IP Issues in Cloud Computing Contracts

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Intellectual Property

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

Spotting and Handling Key IP Issues in Cloud Computing Contracts

January 29, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Customized Interfaces or Services

When your client outsources its IT functions, a one-size-fits-all approach usually won't work. The client will often be paying its cloud service provider (or a third-party consultant) significant professional fees (fees that exceed $100,000 are not unusual) to customize the screens and other interfaces that its employees see.

Most enterprise software will not work for your client right out of the box — it needs to be configured to align with your client's operations. This work is usually categorized in cloud contracts under the broad heading of "implementation services." If your client also needs its customers to have access to the data in the cloud, the implementation services will usually involve the design of websites and other online portals that include the company's service marks, distinctive colors and trade dress.

With your client spending all of this money, it is crucial that you secure for your client in the deal documents sufficient rights in the customized work so that it can use the work product again in the future — either with another IT service provider or even by its own employees if your client is retaining some in-house IT capability.

You will need to pay particular attention to the provisions in the documents describing which party owns or retains rights in the "work product" or "deliverables." Obviously, the service provider will want to retain some rights in customized work so that useful solutions originally designed for your client can be used with its other customers.

How extensively your client will want to negotiate these provisions depends on how much of a competitive advantage your client believes that its business processes confer. If your client thinks its particular business practices as reflected in the custom IT work that the consultant is performing are distinctive in its industry and constitute a valuable trade secret, you'll want provisions that give your client broad ownership rights and exclusive rights to use the work product.

If the custom work isn't so crucial to your client's success, an agreement with the service provider that permits concurrent rights to use and modify certain parts of the deliverables will usually be acceptable.

Work for Hire

On a more basic level, you will also need to confirm that the service provider itself has the power to grant ownership and use rights to your client. If the service provider uses subcontractors to perform work for your client rather than employees (a very common approach in the IT industry), you need to provide in the deal documents that the service provider is required to bind all of the contractors to "work for hire" and other agreements that transfer all rights in their work to the service provider. Only then will the service provider have rights to transfer ownership and use rights to your client in the work product and deliverables.

Licensing Issues

When your client outsources its IT functions, one of the tradeoffs in the new arrangement is a certain loss of operational flexibility. The cloud service provider will typically be managing IT for numerous clients and will have developed institutional procedures and practices that are more routinized than your client may be used to when its own employees were running its in-house IT department.

This downside to cloud-based IT often manifests itself in the software licenses for the applications your client uses.

You'll need to assist your client in figuring out which provisions in the licenses could have operational significance and then attempt to negotiate them accordingly. For example, can the cloud provider host all of the software applications that your client uses or will certain programs and databases need to remain local (i.e., on site)? If the provider won't or can't host certain programs, does it offer suitable alternatives that your client can use? Can your client add new applications or modules to the cloud whenever it wants or will the provider act as a gatekeeper to decide which programs it will or won't host?

Continue reading

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Kleinbard Bell & Brecker

Key categories

    
  • Intellectual Property

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
  4. Cloud Computing and Unexpected FCPA Jurisdiction
    •      
  5. Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do it Right
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media