Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Best Practices for Corporate Internal Investigations

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2

Best Practices for Corporate Internal Investigations

January 24, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Every lawyer has some variation of the Upjohn warnings, but they generally include the following:

  • I represent the corporation. I'm not your lawyer.
  • I'm going to ask you questions regarding the big problem; our conversation is privileged. It is the company's choice whether or not to waive that privilege. If the company decides to waive the privilege, the information you provide may be disclosed to others.
  • You can talk about the big problem to others; however, you may not talk about what you and I say during this interview to other employees or third parties with the exception of your lawyer, if you choose to hire one.
  • Are you willing to be interviewed regarding the big problem?

Once you have provided the employee with sufficient Upjohn warnings, the attorney-client privilege is maintained by the company. One problem occurs when the company self-reports the employee's criminal conduct and the employee obviously wants to keep his or her inculpatory admissions privileged. The employee's personal attorney sends your client-company a letter stating that the employee reasonably believed he or she was being represented by you at the interview. You respond with an affidavit from the auditor and a letter explaining that you provided adequate Upjohn warnings. Now it is up to a judge. Could you have done something differently to alleviate your new big problem? Yes.

At the end of the interview, you can ask the employee to sign an acknowledgement that you provided Upjohn warnings. Write each warning out on the acknowledgement. Remind the employee that you gave the Upjohn warnings at the start of the interview and that the acknowledgement merely serves as his or her written confirmation of receipt of those warnings. Make sure the employee initials each warning on the document. Timing is important. If you give the employee an acknowledgement form at the beginning of the interview, you will likely intimidate the employee. The employee will be suspicious and, more importantly, less open and honest in providing answers. •

Hayes Hunt is a member of Cozen O'Connor in the firm's commercial litigation and criminal defense and government investigations practice groups. Email him at hhunt@cozen.com.

This article originally appeared in The Legal Intelligencer.

Previous

  • 1
  • 2


Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Cozen O'Connor

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • United States Federal Reserve System
  • Sherwin-Williams Company
  • Custom Designs & Manufacturing
  • Oracle Corporation
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Google Inc.
  • Superior Court
  • Supreme Court

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Executive Agencies
  • Litigation
  • US Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  2. Bloomberg Names Compliance Chief After Client Data Breach
    •      
  3. 6 Things In-House Counsel Must Know About E-Discovery
    •      
  4. 3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?
    •      
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb: The Caped Crusaders
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Three Strategies for Reducing Class Action Costs

Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

LegalTech West Coast to Kick Off With 'Tech Audit' Keynote

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lenders Win On Foreclosures
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media