Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > 10 Phrases In-House Lawyers Hear That Portend Disaster

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

10 Phrases In-House Lawyers Hear That Portend Disaster

December 19, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (2)
 
  • "That's not our problem; it's the other side's problem"
  • "Let them worry about that."

When people start saying things like that, ask whether they're doing so because the statements are true or because the underlying issue involves unpleasant facts that it's easier not to acknowledge. Recall Ben Franklin's wise advice: "Half a truth is often a great lie."

Litigators and deal makers hear phrases like these. Events are percolating along, and someone on the team asks, "Should we be doing this?" or "Does the other party know about this issue?" When the question answers itself, it's time for the lawyer to ask whether truth or convenience is driving the client's position. Convenience never trumps ethics.

5. "Everybody else is doing it."

Here is just some of what I have heard in 31 years of practicing law:

  • "Companies in my industry don't pay overtime, so why should I?"
  • "The guy with the company down the road fired the union organizer among the employees, and nothing happened to him."
  • "Don't tell me what I can't do; I'm paying you for telling me what I can do."

Those who win the race to the bottom still lose. Stephen Cope, in his book "The Great Work of Your Life: A Guide for the Journey to Your True Calling" explains that "The Bhagavad Gita" teaches that it is better to follow one's true dharma and fail than to follow others' false dharma and succeed monetarily. And, let's face it: The truth comes out in the end.

6. "We can't change course now. We have too much invested."

This is false-dichotomy territory. How can a lawyer break through this either/or mindset? Mary C. Gentile offers advice in her book, "Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know What's Right." She suggests changing the frame. Reject "We did not get what we wanted." Embrace "What did we learn from this experience?"

Failing to do so conjures up, for me, lines from W. H. Auden's "The Age of Anxiety": "We would rather be ruined than changed/We would rather die in our dread/than climb the cross of the moment/and let our illusions die." Change course. It's the smart play.

7. Another pair of eyes on the project? You're joking, right? What a waste."

True, projects are overlawyered and overanalyzed. But active resistance to advice is a telling sign that something maybe seriously amiss. Take it as a warning to press all the more for that other set of eyes.

An ostrich-like attitude of self-delusion can lead to disaster. Listen to Proverbs 1:30-31: "They would none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices."

8. "We've always thought about it this way, and we always will."

I can do no better than Justice Felix Frankfurter, who decided a legal issue one way in 1943 and then completely reversed course in 1949. He gave this explanation in his opinion in Henslee v. Union Planters Bank: "Wisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late." Genius.

9. "It is what it is."

Huh? This phrase now is used principally by those who want to sound insightful and wise but who are just dazed and confused. Only Buddhist monks are allowed to talk like Buddhist monks.

Continue reading

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to Texas Lawyer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Calling It Like It Is

    December 19, 2012 01:23 PM

    A great article. I like that it tells in-house lawyers to get out ahead of problems and insists that you should.



    I would add - "I am willing to assume that risk." Ask that person about that after a disaster occurs. Generally the person making that statement has no idea of the real risks, doesn't care, can't afford to evaluate the "real" risks or some combination of the three.

  • Portia's Daughter

    December 19, 2012 10:07 AM

    I truly enjoyed this article, and have collected the on-point quotations for my own edification. You raise a number of extraordinarily critical facts, in particular those related to the ways of the sociopath. I have both read the two books you cite to, and have been the victim of a sociopath myself. Would that I had been warned and taught the signs of the danger; my life would be very different today.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Constangy, Brooks & Smith

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Texas Board of Legal Specialization
  • Great Work
  • EEOC
  • Regions Financial Corporation

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Safeguarding Brand Reputation In Social Media
    •      
  2. Another SEC Whistleblower, More On the Way
    •      
  3. Are GCs More Than Just Legally Trained Executives?
    •      
  4. Patent Board's SAP Ruling is First Under New AIA Rules
    •      
  5. Minority-Owned Firm Makes Microsoft's Premier List
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media