Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Judge Says 'Santa Claus is Coming to Town' Copyright Suit Came to Wrong Town

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Judge Says 'Santa Claus is Coming to Town' Copyright Suit Came to Wrong Town

By John Pacenti Contact All Articles 

Daily Business Review

December 13, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

For decades, parents have cribbed the lines of "Santa Claus is Coming to Town" to keep children in check during the holidays, telling them they "better not cry, better not pout."

Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band did a rockin' version of the song replete with a big sax solo by the late Clarence Clemmons.

Make no mistake, "Santa Claus is Coming to Town" is a money maker for the heirs of the songwriters and the EMI Feist Catalogue Inc., the London-based music company that obtained ownership rights to the song in 1981.

A federal judge in West Palm Beach ruled Monday that a lawsuit seeking to break that agreement, though ripe, was filed in the wrong jurisdiction.

"The activities of the affiliated entities that plaintiffs have uncovered are either unrelated to defendant, do not take place in Florida or fall well short of the level of activity required to establish general personal jurisdiction," U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra wrote in his 10-page decision.

But the fight over one of the most iconic holiday songs in Americana is far from over.

Attorney David P. Milian, a partner at Carey Rodriguez Greenberg & O'Keefe in Miami who represents the heirs, said he plans to refile the complaint in New York to try to break the agreement.

The song was written in 1934 by John Frederick Coots and Haven Gillespie. Their heirs get royalties from EMI every time it's recorded or used in any capacity. The amended complaint filed April 12 asserts the family has a right to break the agreement under the Copyright Act amended in 1976 and 1998.

"They feel they would be in a better position to exploit the work and derive greater economic value," Milian said. "It is one of the top 10 songs of all time. Every major artist recorded it if it's on a Christmas album. It's one of the standards."

The song also is the basis for the much beloved stop-motion 1970s television special of the same name in which the song is sung by none other than Fred Astaire.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to Daily Business Review

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Pryor Cashman

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • EMI
  • Carey Rodriguez Greenberg & O'Keefe

Key categories

    
  • Entertainment and Sports Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
  4. Cloud Computing and Unexpected FCPA Jurisdiction
    •      
  5. Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do it Right
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media