Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Using Accounting Basics to Uncover Embezzlement

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Using Accounting Basics to Uncover Embezzlement

By Frank L. McElroy All Articles 

Texas Lawyer

November 30, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Credit: Gina Sanders/Fotolia

Credit: Gina Sanders/Fotolia

Protecting a company from embezzlement requires that in-house lawyers have a basic understanding of various accounting roles and when to call in expert help.

As an unfortunate part of any business, there are almost endless opportunities for employees to take advantage of their positions to misappropriate money from their employers. Often, those activities go undetected for months, if not years, and lead to significant losses.

Although companies may have internal-controls systems in place, even the most robust and comprehensive plans are worthless if not properly implemented, followed, monitored and updated.

What's worse, many companies wrongfully assume that their accountant is already providing services that will protect them. A company that has engaged a tax return preparer or accountant to attest to its financial statements has not purchased an insurance policy to protect it from employees who are stealing money. In fact, that company has not even engaged the accountant to scour all company records to detect fraud or misappropriation.

Instead, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' (AICPA) standards for tax return services and Internal Revenue Service Circular 230 state that a tax return preparer may rely in good faith on information furnished by clients without verification, unless something appears incomplete, inconsistent or incorrect.

Likewise, the AICPA standards applicable to what are called attest services (such as compilation, review and auditing of financial statements) state that company management, not the accountant, is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining internal controls and preventing and detecting fraud.

Even if the accountant is performing an audit, those services will not necessarily catch the embezzlement of client funds. Ultimately, the information on a company's financial statements is management's representation, not the accountant's.

The truth, therefore, is that accountants rely on the company's representations to perform their services. Although there are, of course, situations where a tax return preparer or auditor will uncover a misappropriation or embezzlement, there are significantly more situations where theft can go undiscovered. The ultimate responsibility for detecting a problem is management's. The most difficult setback for companies often occurs when a member of management is the one who is involved in the misappropriation.

Get Proper Help

Uncovering misappropriations requires a different kind of accounting service than tax advice or financial statement attest work — namely, forensic accounting. Some accountants provide traditional services, such as audits or tax return preparation, in addition to forensic accounting work. But others specialize in forensic accounting and have been certified by various organizations such as the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners and AICPA.

Unfortunately, companies generally will not engage the services of a forensic accountant or other consultant until they have identified a problem. But some take a more proactive approach. Instead of waiting for a problem to be discovered, they engage an accountant to review their systems, suggest improvements and look into specific areas where the company has concerns. Such action can help these companies avoid embezzlement all together, which can be a significant cost savings.

On the other end of the spectrum are companies who not only wait for a problem to arise before seeking a solution but also decide to limit the scope of the forensic accountant's work once an issue has arisen. Often this happens because the company only maintains partial insurance coverage for the loss, wants to deal only with known issues in the false hope that the problems are limited to one employee, or simply desires to keep costs low. The company chooses to cut corners by only allowing the forensic accountant access to particular years, accounts or segments of a company.

A thorough investigation by the forensic accountant, however, can identify any accomplices within the company and identify the full range of issues the company must address to make sure that the same mistakes do not occur again. Without allowing the forensic accountant to provide that range of service, the company may find itself in same situation once again.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to Texas Lawyer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Association of Certified Fraud Examiners
  • Internal Revenue Service Circular
  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants

Key categories

    
  • Banking & Finance
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Criminal Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  2. 6 Things In-House Counsel Must Know About E-Discovery
    •      
  3. 3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?
    •      
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb: The Caped Crusaders
    •      
  5. U.S. Legal System Ranked as Most Costly
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

LegalTech West Coast to Kick Off With 'Tech Audit' Keynote

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lenders Win On Foreclosures
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media