Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Northern District of California Unveils E-Discovery Guidelines

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2

Northern District of California Unveils E-Discovery Guidelines

November 29, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Oakland employment lawyer Kathryn Dickson of Dickson Geesman, a committee member, said solo and small-firm lawyers have been slower to master e-discovery and may avoid discussing details with opposing counsel because they feel outmatched. The guidelines and the checklist should help, she said.

"Plaintiffs lawyers feel technologically deficient, so they're really afraid to just dive in and grapple with these issues," Dickson said. "These are the kinds of things people really need to address so that they're properly representing their clients."

Edward Reines of Weil, Gotshal & Manges said the guidelines reflect "a lot of give and take" between the interest of plaintiffs lawyers in obtaining information early in a case and the concern of defense lawyers over responding to broad and expensive requests.

The guidelines encourage parties to prioritize and phase discovery requests and to balance the cost and burden of requests against factors like the amount in controversy, the parties' resources, the issues at stake in the litigation and the importance of the discovery to resolving the case.

"We now have a process to guide and standardize what we need to do," Reines said.

Also serving on the committee were Stephanie Mendelsohn, director of corporate records and e-discovery at Genentech Inc.; Joseph Saveri, a plaintiffs-side antitrust lawyer of the Joseph Saveri Law Firm; and Neill Tseng, a civil litigator in the U.S. attorney's office.

Laporte said the Northern District considered and built on initiatives taken by other federal district courts to deal with e-discovery, as well as a pilot project launched in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2009.

The district court's combination of guidelines, a checklist and a model order is "a good example" for other jurisdictions to follow, said Thomas Allman, former general counsel of BASF Corp. and chair of The Sedona Conference's e-discovery working group.

Litigants should neither be intimidated nor obsessed by e-discovery, he said.

"The fact of the matter is discovery in general is now dominated by electronically stored information," Allman said. "Generally speaking, you get a better result if you are mindful of the need to give and get and don't fight over things that aren't worth fighting over."

This article originally appeared in The Recorder.

Previous

  • 1
  • 2


Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Weil, Gotshal & Manges

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • The Sedona Conference
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges
  • BASF SE
  • Genentech Inc.
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Internet and Technology Law
  • Litigation

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  2. Bloomberg Names Compliance Chief After Client Data Breach
    •      
  3. Facebook's General Counsel is Leaving Company
    •      
  4. 6 Things In-House Counsel Must Know About E-Discovery
    •      
  5. Wage-and-Hour Suits Up for Fifth Straight Year
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media