Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Tips on Keeping Clients (Very) Happy

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Tips on Keeping Clients (Very) Happy

The Careerist

By Vivia Chen Contact All Articles 

The Careerist

March 14, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
© igor - Fotolia.com

© igor - Fotolia.com

The perennial question on everyone's lips: How to get and keep clients? We've heard from plenty of business development experts over the years, but not nearly enough from partners at major firms.

Luckily, Michael McDonald, a partner at Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton's London office, is filling that gap. RollOnFriday got its claws on McDonald's memo, "How to Superplease Clients," which was sent out to the firm's trainees and associates. The memo lists what they can do to keep external and "internal" clients (e.g., partners) happy. (We asked Cleary for comment, but have not heard back.)

Let me just say, it is quite amusing. Sometimes, McDonald seems so solicitious of clients' needs that he sounds like he's catering to prized poodles. At the same time, though, he's also being very comprehensive—offering about 50 tips on client relations. (RollOnFriday suggests that you "stick [the list] on your fridge.")

McDonald starts off on a somewhat apologetic note, noting that some might find his advice "overly North American and dated." Despite the horror of being one of those eager-to-please Yanks, McDonald says it's time to acknowledge that client are "demanding" these days—"wherever they are located."

Indeed, McDonald fits nicely within the eager-beaver lawyer mode. He tells young lawyers to:

  • "Always exceed client expectations."
  • "Set realistic deadlines and always exceed them."
  • "Come in under budget."

In other words, he's advocating that lawyers overdeliver. Probably not realistic for associates who are already working under tremendous time pressures, though I get his drift.

But McDonald also seems to suggest that lawyers should go to extremes to satisfy the business and personal needs of clients:

  • "Remember birthdays/ make it personal!"
  • "Assist with personal legal needs."
  • "Adjust holiday plans if essential to the client."
  • "Be attentive to their personal needs if they are under stress." (RollOnFriday says it's "unclear if this extends to a back rub, a dance, or dressing them up as a baby and feeding them rusks.")
  • "Make them look good." (Is that a derivation of the old Vidal Sassoon ad: "If you don't look good, we don't look good"?)

We can poke fun at McDonald's seemingly over-the-top advice on making clients happy, but he's probably on the right track. Probably lots of successful lawyers do all these little personal things, but just don't set them to paper. In a way, I guess McDonald is doing a public service by being so up-front about his methods.

What do you think—is this just old-fashioned suck-up, or is he going to the extreme?

Do you have topics you'd like to discuss or tips to share? Email chief blogger Vivia Chen at vchen@alm.com. Follow The Careerist on Twitter: twitter.com/lawcareerist.

This article originally appeared as a post on The Careerist.

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Really?!

    March 14, 2013 12:24 PM

    It may be hard to argue with McDonald's presumed success or maybe he simply does not know what makes him successful.



    It is not too long ago that I was a client. I cared about getting work that I could rely on when it was promised to me. I felt that I could manage what I needed and when I needed it. Overdelivering wasn't necessary; just deliver it when you said you would. You'd be surprised at how many lawyers struggle with that.



    And I didn't need a third parent, psychiatrist, social chairman, ticket broker, cheering section or someone to hold my hand. I avoided all but the minimum in favors. I had no time for it and would have been embarassed by it.



    Now back in private practice, I get the sense that is how most (not all) of my clients feel. If I sense that they do want it, I deliver it. But I put them in them in the minority.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • McDonald's Corporation
  • Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
  4. Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do it Right
    •      
  5. Cloud Computing and Unexpected FCPA Jurisdiction
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media