Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Legal Issues for Gender-Transitioning Employees

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Legal Issues for Gender-Transitioning Employees

By Shannon Green Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

March 8, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
transgender

Image: ParaDox via Wikimedia Commons

When a gender-transitioning employee of Access Health Care Physicians LLC began showing up for work dressed as a male on certain days and a female on others, management asked in-house counsel Bradley Brown for advice. The nurse practitioner had been hired as a male, and as she went through the transition to female, the health care company had some questions about how to best to support her.

Brown said in an email to CorpCounsel.com that Access Health is a diverse and welcoming employer, and it didn’t have to go to great lengths to prepare for the employee’s transition. But the situation was still somewhat unexpected, and as in-house counsel he wanted to make sure he wasn’t overlooking any potential legal issues.

He started a discussion thread on the LinkedIn page of In The House, a web-based professional networking community for in-house counsel, asking for resources and advice from other lawyers who had experience with transgender workers. One of the group’s members referred him to the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), a nonprofit law firm and leading advocacy organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.

NCLR legal director Shannon Minter told CorpCounsel.com that although the organization primarily serves individuals, employers are increasingly seeking advice about transgender workers. “I’ve been pleasantly surprised that we are starting to get a significant number of contacts from employers who are calling and saying, ‘We have an employee who is transitioning, and we want to do the right thing. Can you help us determine what that is?’ ”

Minter, who transitioned from female to male in the mid-90s, says that even though he was working for a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) organization in San Francisco at the time, he was uncertain how his employer would react. In fact, he recalls, “I was terrified.”

Now, when advising other employers how best to handle an employee’s transition, Minter says the information he gives is rather simple: Respect and accept their new identity.

“That is the touchstone,” he says. “If employers can understand that basic concept, almost everything else follows very naturally.” Minter acknowledges that if the employer and other employees have known the transitioning worker as one gender, it can be challenging initially to adapt when that worker becomes the other gender.

“Employers worry that it will be something people will not be able to understand, but they do,” he says. “The reality is, after what is usually an amazingly short period, other workers don’t even think about it anymore.”

But for that to happen, the workplace environment must be supportive. Minter says management should be very clear that it expects coworkers to treat the transitioning individual like any other male or female employee.

Minter frowns on the tendency of some employers to require a transgender employee to use a separate restroom. “If leadership makes it clear that the employee is to be accepted as a man or woman in every way,” says Minter, “people will get used to the fact that the employee is using the restroom that corresponds to their gender identity.”

Designating a separate restroom for one employee will send the message that the transgender employee is different from everyone else. “That doesn’t allow anyone to go through the process of getting comfortable with the new situation.”

Access Health chose to take a very proactive approach to its employee’s transition. Management made a company-wide announcement to help other employees know which name, male or female, to use during the nurse practitioner’s transition. The company will soon be featuring her in a newsletter, which it will distribute to all its employees and patients.

According to the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), only 16 states and the District of Columbia currently have laws prohibiting discrimination based on both sexual orientation and gender identity [PDF].

But employers are reaching out to NCLR from states that don’t have any laws banning discrimination against transgender workers. “Many employers generally want to do the right thing by their employees,” says Minter. “And especially if they have someone who is a valued employee and they’ve put resources into training them,” he says, “employers generally would like to retain those employees.”

According to HRC, hundreds of companies already have policies protecting their LGBT employees [PDF]. As of December 2012, 434 (88 percent) of Fortune 500 companies had non-discrimination policies including sexual orientation, and 282 (57 percent) had policies prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity.

“Companies recognize that it is just so much better for our national business climate for LGBT people to be fully included an embraced,” says Minter, noting that LGBT employees also make up a significant part of the U.S. workforce.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission now accepts gender identity discrimination claims from employees in any state. Last year, the EEOC ruled in Macy v. Department of Justice that gender identity discrimination is covered under Title VII.

Says Minter of the impact of that decision, “There was already a very strong judicial trend toward recognizing that Title VII protects transgender employees. Now any transgender employee who is working for a private employer that’s covered by Title VII—which is most of them—who experiences discrimination can file a complaint with the EEOC.”

The EEOC could not provide a breakdown of gender-based discrimination claims post-Macy. But Minter has noted a dramatic increase in employer awareness of the issue following the decision.

“It’s a big step,” he says. “Employers are taking note, and they should be.”



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Marcy Aurand

    March 08, 2013 11:37 AM

    Guess I will shortly.how much the EEOC backs it's words. The Federal Gov sure don't.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • National Center for Lesbian Rights
  • Human Rights Campaign
  • Physicians Inc.
  • EEOC
  • Access Health Inc.
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • Department of Justice

Key categories

    
  • In-House Counsel and Corporate Law Departments
  • Civil Rights and Constitutional Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Safeguarding Brand Reputation In Social Media
    •      
  2. Another SEC Whistleblower, More On the Way
    •      
  3. Patent Board's SAP Ruling is First Under New AIA Rules
    •      
  4. Are GCs More Than Just Legally Trained Executives?
    •      
  5. Minority-Owned Firm Makes Microsoft's Premier List
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media