Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > A Handbag Maker Battles Counterfeits and Copyright Copycats

Font Size: increase font decrease font

A Handbag Maker Battles Counterfeits and Copyright Copycats

By Shannon Green Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

February 28, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
cambridge_satchel

When Julie Deane invested £600 to found The Cambridge Satchel Company Ltd. in 2008, she knew fending off counterfeits and other forms of fraud would be an unavoidable cost of doing business in the apparel and accessories industry. But she didn’t predict that so many of her IP troubles would originate so close to home.

“I expected that if the company were to be successful, there would be imitations and people setting out to copy, but I didn’t think they would come from within the U.K.,” says Deane. “I thought that they would come from Asia.”

What she found instead were many nearby entities willing to engage in counterfeiting, copyright infringement, and cybersquatting—one of them literally right under her nose.

In 2010 Deane enlisted Leicester Remedials & Sewing to help keep up with increasing demand for her company’s leather handbags. Not long after, an anonymous phone call from an employee of the manufacturer confirmed an earlier tip: “They’re using your leather to make bags with their label and hiding them in a storage unit across the road.” The counterfeit handbags used Cambridge Satchel designs with a label that said “Zatchels.”

“It was a horrible feeling of being completely violated,” says Deane. “These are people I had shared all of my ideas with,” she says. “They contacted customers that they—as my manufacturer—knew I supplied.” Last summer Cambridge Satchel reached a confidential settlement with the company for copyright infringement.

Before she started the company, the mother of two school-aged children had looked at websites all over the country for funky colored, but otherwise traditional, leather satchels. “They just weren’t around,” she said, so Deane started up her company in order to make the bags herself.

The concept quickly took off, both at home and abroad. But about a year into running the business, Deane first discovered that when she typed Cambridge Satchel into a search engine, fakes popped up too, with either exact matches or deceptively similar names. “All of a sudden Oxford Satchel would come up,” she says, “even though it was based in Yorkshire.”

The bags she saw were exact copies of the Cambridge Satchel bags—in the exact style, sizes and colors. They were of poor quality, but the websites were spot-on duplicates of Cambridge Satchel’s legitimate site.

“They’ve even got the cheek to put all of our contact details on there,” she says. Customers called the company with bogus order numbers, complaining of poor quality or missing bags. Deane hired lawyers to take down the fraudulent sites, but they’d just come back with new names.

Things got worse before they got better. Last year the company was featured in a series of promotional videos for Google Chrome, “The Web is What You Make of It.” The ad generated a lot of positive attention, but when Deane searched Facebook and Twitter, she found Cambridge Satchel accounts that had nothing do with the company.

“These weren’t fan sites,” says Deane. Brand abusers will rank higher on search engines if they have a three-dimensional web presence, she explains. “If people have bought a domain with the express intention of confusing customers, one of the first things they’ll do is set up a Facebook and Twitter presence.”

Deane notes that she’s found the United States is the biggest market for counterfeits of her products. According to a recent study by brand protection firm MarkMonitor, one in five bargain hunters in both the U.S. and Europe mistakenly shopped on e-commerce sites offering counterfeit goods while looking for online deals.

Perkins Coie’s William Rava said in an email to CorpCounsel.com, “Most consumers are not looking for counterfeit or pirated goods, but the bad guys are very good at search engine optimization, creating multiple pathways, and designing sophisticated, believable landing sites.”

Cambridge Satchel enlisted MarkMonitor to ramp up brand protection late last year. The firm detected more than 300 fake websites capitalizing on the brand’s success, says Deane. Since the company began working with MarkMonitor, it has eliminated more than 1,000 counterfeit product listings.

Instead of going after brand abusers one at a time, the firm targeted bulk distributors. “Now that we’re working in a very organized in a systematic way, the ‘re-pop-up’ rate has fallen off, thank goodness,” says Deane.

Frederick Felman, chief marketing officer of MarkMonitor, said in a press release [PDF] announcing the collaboration: “The web’s tremendous reach and economies of scale have revolutionized the way brands engage customers and drive their business. But the very qualities that make the web so attractive for business growth, can make it easy and lucrative for online brand abusers to hijack powerful brands like the Cambridge Satchel Company.”



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Perkins Coie

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Leicester Remedials & Sewing
  • The Cambridge Satchel Company

Key categories

    
  • White Collar Crime

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Safeguarding Brand Reputation In Social Media
    •      
  2. Another SEC Whistleblower, More On the Way
    •      
  3. Patent Board's SAP Ruling is First Under New AIA Rules
    •      
  4. Are GCs More Than Just Legally Trained Executives?
    •      
  5. What to Look for in a Board's Risk Director
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media