Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > A Handbag Maker Battles Counterfeits and Copyright Copycats

Font Size: increase font decrease font

A Handbag Maker Battles Counterfeits and Copyright Copycats

By Shannon Green Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

February 28, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
cambridge_satchel

When Julie Deane invested £600 to found The Cambridge Satchel Company Ltd. in 2008, she knew fending off counterfeits and other forms of fraud would be an unavoidable cost of doing business in the apparel and accessories industry. But she didn’t predict that so many of her IP troubles would originate so close to home.

“I expected that if the company were to be successful, there would be imitations and people setting out to copy, but I didn’t think they would come from within the U.K.,” says Deane. “I thought that they would come from Asia.”

What she found instead were many nearby entities willing to engage in counterfeiting, copyright infringement, and cybersquatting—one of them literally right under her nose.

In 2010 Deane enlisted Leicester Remedials & Sewing to help keep up with increasing demand for her company’s leather handbags. Not long after, an anonymous phone call from an employee of the manufacturer confirmed an earlier tip: “They’re using your leather to make bags with their label and hiding them in a storage unit across the road.” The counterfeit handbags used Cambridge Satchel designs with a label that said “Zatchels.”

“It was a horrible feeling of being completely violated,” says Deane. “These are people I had shared all of my ideas with,” she says. “They contacted customers that they—as my manufacturer—knew I supplied.” Last summer Cambridge Satchel reached a confidential settlement with the company for copyright infringement.

Before she started the company, the mother of two school-aged children had looked at websites all over the country for funky colored, but otherwise traditional, leather satchels. “They just weren’t around,” she said, so Deane started up her company in order to make the bags herself.

The concept quickly took off, both at home and abroad. But about a year into running the business, Deane first discovered that when she typed Cambridge Satchel into a search engine, fakes popped up too, with either exact matches or deceptively similar names. “All of a sudden Oxford Satchel would come up,” she says, “even though it was based in Yorkshire.”

The bags she saw were exact copies of the Cambridge Satchel bags—in the exact style, sizes and colors. They were of poor quality, but the websites were spot-on duplicates of Cambridge Satchel’s legitimate site.

“They’ve even got the cheek to put all of our contact details on there,” she says. Customers called the company with bogus order numbers, complaining of poor quality or missing bags. Deane hired lawyers to take down the fraudulent sites, but they’d just come back with new names.

Things got worse before they got better. Last year the company was featured in a series of promotional videos for Google Chrome, “The Web is What You Make of It.” The ad generated a lot of positive attention, but when Deane searched Facebook and Twitter, she found Cambridge Satchel accounts that had nothing do with the company.

“These weren’t fan sites,” says Deane. Brand abusers will rank higher on search engines if they have a three-dimensional web presence, she explains. “If people have bought a domain with the express intention of confusing customers, one of the first things they’ll do is set up a Facebook and Twitter presence.”

Deane notes that she’s found the United States is the biggest market for counterfeits of her products. According to a recent study by brand protection firm MarkMonitor, one in five bargain hunters in both the U.S. and Europe mistakenly shopped on e-commerce sites offering counterfeit goods while looking for online deals.

Perkins Coie’s William Rava said in an email to CorpCounsel.com, “Most consumers are not looking for counterfeit or pirated goods, but the bad guys are very good at search engine optimization, creating multiple pathways, and designing sophisticated, believable landing sites.”

Cambridge Satchel enlisted MarkMonitor to ramp up brand protection late last year. The firm detected more than 300 fake websites capitalizing on the brand’s success, says Deane. Since the company began working with MarkMonitor, it has eliminated more than 1,000 counterfeit product listings.

Instead of going after brand abusers one at a time, the firm targeted bulk distributors. “Now that we’re working in a very organized in a systematic way, the ‘re-pop-up’ rate has fallen off, thank goodness,” says Deane.

Frederick Felman, chief marketing officer of MarkMonitor, said in a press release [PDF] announcing the collaboration: “The web’s tremendous reach and economies of scale have revolutionized the way brands engage customers and drive their business. But the very qualities that make the web so attractive for business growth, can make it easy and lucrative for online brand abusers to hijack powerful brands like the Cambridge Satchel Company.”



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Perkins Coie

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Leicester Remedials & Sewing
  • The Cambridge Satchel Company

Key categories

    
  • White Collar Crime

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
  4. Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do it Right
    •      
  5. Cloud Computing and Unexpected FCPA Jurisdiction
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media