Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Passing Muster

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Passing Muster

A Federal Trade Commission report reveals which mergers trigger scrutiny.

By Jenna Greene All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

March 1, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

If your company is merging, and you want to avoid getting the hairy eyeball from the Federal Trade Commission, you would be well advised to avoid deals that involve "hot documents" or customer complaints. And it really would be best if you didn't work for a pharmaceutical company.

These are some of the conclusions that can be gleaned from an FTC report released in January that details the agency's merger enforcement activity from 1996 until 2011.

Breaking down the competition issues in 464 investigations, the report found that in horizontal mergers—those in which direct competitors seek to combine—the agency issued a second request for documents in 264 cases? need some kind of noun here these are all about the 464 investigations (see beginning of sentence) , or 57 percent. In vertical mergers—typically between a supplier and a customer—second requests were issued just 28 times (about 11 percent) during the 16-year period covered by the report.

The report also showed that 46 deals were closed after a "quick look," that is, an investigation that was dropped by the FTC "due to the insignificance of one of the merging parties." In 86 instances, companies abandoned their proposed deals while the FTC investigation was ongoing.

Deals where the agency uncovered "hot documents" had a tough time winning approval. According to the report, "A document is 'hot' if it predicts that the merger will produce an adverse price or nonprice effect on competition. The most obvious situation involves acquiring party documents that predict a price effect stemming from the merger."

The FTC discovered such hot documents in 28 proposed mergers, and took enforcement action against 25 of them—or 89 percent of the deals. In the 230 mergers without hot documents, the FTC took action against 150, or 65 percent.

Even more damning were strong customer complaints—instances where customers (not competitors) "expressed a credible concern that a significant anticompetitive effect would result if the transaction were allowed to proceed."

In the 114 mergers where the FTC received such complaints, the agency took enforcement action against 111 deals—97 percent of the time. In 122 deals without strong customer complaints, the FTC took action against 53—or 43 percent.

The report also found that pharmaceutical mergers were the least likely to survive FTC scrutiny unscathed. Of 122 deals involving pharmaceutical markets, the FTC sought some kind of relief (such as a divestiture) in 119 (98 percent). By comparison, of the 20 hospital deals subject to second requests, the FTC took enforcement action in just eight (40 percent) and let the balance proceed without concessions.

A version of this story appeared in The National Law Journal, a sibling publication of Corporate Counsel.



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Federal Trade Commission

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
  4. Cloud Computing and Unexpected FCPA Jurisdiction
    •      
  5. Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do it Right
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media