Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > The Case For a Combined Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2

The Case For a Combined Code of Business Ethics and Conduct

January 16, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Cases in Point

Example 1: John's Judgment

Imagine a mid-level employee, John, at a marketing event for prospective clients. In an attempt to generate new business, John’s manager reveals the name of a high-profile celebrity client.

John believes that company policy, and perhaps the law, prohibits publicizing clients' names. He vaguely recalls a training event in which employees were advised not to discuss customers outside the company.

His manager’s actions might skirt internal guidelines and the law. But how should John address this? He consults the company’s code of conduct, which includes a specific prohibition on disclosing customer information, including customer names, to the public. Worse, the code indicates this might violate privacy and information security laws and regulations.

Adding to John's woes, the code further directs that, upon discovering such a violation, he should report the misconduct to his manager—who, of course, happens to be the one who violated the code—or to another unspecified supervisor.

If John goes to his manager, he runs the risk that nothing will be done to address the current violation and that his manager will retaliate. He's also afraid that if he goes to his manager’s supervisor, his manager will find out, while no corrective action will be taken. After all, it's been increasingly difficult to win new business in the current economy, and John has heard several times in recent months how the company's top priority is to obtain new contracts.

John decides not to do anything, reasoning that although technically a rule has been violated, perhaps no real damage has been done.

Example 2: Katie's Call

At a company across town, Katie, an IT company procurement supervisor, needs to order new computer accessories for a contract that her company just secured. Her best friend operates a company that produces such accessories.

Although her friend’s company doesn't offer the lowest price, the friend assures her that the company produces the best products and has a great customer service team. Katie checks her company’s code of conduct to make sure that there is no conflict in doing business with her friend.

The code states that certain interactions and business relationships with immediate family are prohibited as conflicts of interest, but contains no restrictions against the type of transaction that Katie is contemplating.

Believing that no conflict of interest exists, Katie signs a contract with her friend.

--

In Example 1, John decided not to report his manager’s disclosure of a customer’s identity because it resulted in new business, which John believed was the most important factor to the company.

He might well have behaved differently given the benefit of a combined code of business ethics and conduct, which not only clearly proscribed such conduct, but also explained that the transgression was the antithesis of the company’s principles regarding its loyalty and responsibility to its customers and the importance of protecting customer information.

Similarly, in Example 2, ethical guidance would have improved Katie's decision-making by arming her with an understanding of the company’s ethical principles, rather than restricting her to a narrowly drafted code of conduct that didn't cover the decision she needed to make.

Thus equipped, Katie might have understood that conflicts of interest are broadly construed; that she should avoid, if at all possible, doing anything that suggested a conflict; and that, at the very least, such decisions should be reviewed by a manager before proceeding.

[Back to main article]

Previous

  • 1
  • 2


Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Hogan Lovells

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Compliance Officer
  • ACADEMI
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers International
  • Department of Institutional Integrity
  • United States Navy
  • American International Group Inc.
  • New York Stock Exchange Inc.
  • World Bank
  • Joint Chiefs of Staff

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Ethics

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
  4. Cloud Computing and Unexpected FCPA Jurisdiction
    •      
  5. Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do it Right
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media