Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Duke Energy Loses Again in Indiana Ethics Case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Duke Energy Loses Again in Indiana Ethics Case

By Sue Reisinger Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

January 3, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Scott Storms

Scott Storms

The ethics scandal involving Scott Storms, the former general counsel of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, has cost Duke Energy Corp. nearly $12 million.

The IURC originally ruled in July 2010 that Duke’s Indiana subsidiary could pass more the $11.6 million in repair costs incurred during a 2009 ice storm onto its customers, despite the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor recommending against it.

But then the state learned that Duke had offered Storms an in-house counsel job—while he was still GC at the commission and serving as an administrative law judge overseeing hearings on Duke rate requests.

In October 2011 the IURC reversed its decision to grant the relief, and Duke appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals. Friday the appeals court ruled against the energy company [PDF].

The state was represented by deputy attorney general David Steiner and Beth Krogel Roads, assistant GC for the IURC, as well as two attorneys from the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, A. David Stippler and Randall Helmen.

Duke’s lawyers were Jon Laramore and Jane Dall Wilson, from Faegre Baker Daniels in Indianapolis, and Melanie Price, assistant GC at Duke Energy Indiana Inc. The Indiana Energy Association, represented by Frost Brown Todd, had filed an amicus brief on behalf of Duke.

The state consumer counselor argued that the 2009 ice storm was not an “extraordinary” event that required granting special relief to Duke. The energy company should be expected to weather such storms in the ordinary course of business, it said.

Duke’s lawyers argued that the IURC had been “arbitrary and capricious” in changing its mind when reviewing basically the same evidence, and had offered no reason for its reversal.

But the appeals court said the IURC had considered “substantial” updated evidence. “Although the better practice would have been for the IURC to clearly articulate why it reached different conclusions, we find that the updated evidence . . . justified the IURC’s decision to deny Duke relief,” the court’s opinion states.

Duke told the Associated Press it was considering appealing the court’s decision.

The 20-page opinion rehashed the scandal that started this chain of events, and ended with Duke firing Storms and the company president who hired him.

Also fired was David Lott Hardy, then chairman of the IURC, who knew that Duke and Storms were negotiating while the rate hearings were ongoing and didn’t ask Storms to recuse himself.

Last October the state appeals court ruled that Hardy must stand trial for helping Storms set up the new job while working on Duke’s cases. The case is pending.

Storms already received his punishment. Besides the firing, the Indiana Ethics Commission in 2011 ruled that he had violated state laws.

It fined him $12,000 and barred him from future state employment. He has not returned calls seeking comment.

See also: “Ex-Indiana Utility Chief to Stand Trial for Aiding GC,” CorpCounsel, October 2012.



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Baker & Daniels
  • Frost Brown Todd

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
  • Duke Energy Indiana
  • Indiana Ethics Commission
  • Associated Press
  • The Indiana Energy Association
  • David Steiner and Beth Krogel Roads
  • Indiana Court of Appeals
  • Indiana Office
  • Duke Energy Corporation

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Energy & Natural Resources
  • State and Local Courts

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  2. 3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?
    •      
  3. U.S. Legal System Ranked as Most Costly
    •      
  4. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  5. 6 Things In-House Counsel Must Know About E-Discovery
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

The General Counsel and the Compensation Committee

Your Company's Been Hacked -- What Comes Next?

Amid Spy Scandal, Russia Boots Baker & McKenzie Lawyer

Survey: Firm Leaders Admit Downturn's Permanent Impact

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

$3M Judgment Voided Against 'Girls Gone Wild' Producer

Judge Says Boston Bombings Had No Effect on Terrorist Sentences
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court System, Counties Agree on 3 Court Facility Upgrades

Guardian Who Delayed Final Account Must Pay Referee Fee
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out

McVay Wins Superior Court Nod With Western Turnout
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Insurer Beats Bid By Bilked Client
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Barnes Asks For Court-Appointed Lawyer To Help Defend Brooks

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media