Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > U.S. Government Gets PTO Trademark for GI Bill

Font Size: increase font decrease font

U.S. Government Gets PTO Trademark for GI Bill

By Lisa Shuchman Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

December 10, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
veterans_affairs

For the first time since the U.S. government created it 68 years ago in the wake of World War II, the GI Bill is a registered trademark [PDF].

Since 1944, the GI Bill (which was originally passed into law as the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944) has funded higher education for military service members returning to civilian life. And for most of its existence the popular government program did just fine without a trademark. But repeated complaints about fraudulent marketing and recruiting practices aimed at military families eligible for federal education loans under the GI Bill prompted the government to seek a trademark for the GI Bill from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Some intellectual property lawyers have argued that trademarking a government program as well established as the GI Bill is an inappropriate use of the law. Trademarks are generally used to identify and distinguish goods and services, they say, and are for the exclusive commercial use of their owners. The GI Bill is technically a law, and it isn’t selling anything.

Nevertheless, President Barack Obama signed an executive order in April directing the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Education to take measures to “stop deceptive and misleading” promotional efforts that target beneficiaries of the GI Bill. The president specifically requested that the VA register the term “GI Bill” as a trademark so those beneficiaries—members of the military, veterans, and eligible family members and survivors—would be directed only to legitimate GI Bill resources.

Many for-profit colleges and universities market heavily to military families because they can easily get federal loan money through the GI Bill. Some of these schools had been using websites with a military theme that were deemed deceptive because they gave the appearance of being government-run or connected to the GI Bill benefit system, the government said. Government investigations have found that some for-profit colleges and universities recruit veterans without telling them the truth about costs, loans, and dropout rates.

“Trademarking ‘GI Bill’ is a great step forward in continuing our mission to better serve this nation’s Service members, Veterans, and their families,” Allison Hickey, the VA undersecretary for benefits, said in a statement announcing the trademark. Since August 2009, the VA has paid more than $23.8 billion in GI Bill benefits to more than 866,000 veterans, service members, and their families.

It is still unclear how the government will enforce the new trademark. Owners of a trademark must pursue those who use their material improperly. If they don’t, the registration can be cancelled on the grounds of “non-use.” Complications could also arise because the law says if there is no other way to reasonably refer to the trademarked term, the term can still be used by anyone. The VA has not yet clarified how or under what circumstances a school, whether it is a for-profit or not-for-profit entity, can indicate it accepts benefits provided under the GI Bill.

“We want to ensure the right balance with these new guidelines so that our stakeholders can still promote the GI Bill and we can prohibit others from using it fraudulently,” deputy undersecretary for economic opportunity Curtis Coy said.

The VA said it plans to issue terms of use for “GI Bill” within the next six months.

At the same time it announced the GI Bill trademark, the VA said it had also obtained the rights to the website GIBill.com. That site, which mimicked the official GI Bill website (gibill.va.gov), had prompted so many complaints from veterans that the online marketing company that managed it—QuinStreet Inc.—was placed under investigation by attorneys general from 20 states, who alleged it was targeting military veterans with deceptive recruiting practices for its for-profit school clients.

In June, the company agreed to turn over GIBill.com to the VA and pay $2.5 million to the states involved in the case. A web search for GIBill.com now redirects the viewer to the VA’s official site. Before it does, however, it displays the following message: “As the result of a legal settlement, the award of the GIBill.com domain name to VA is a victory for all Veterans and the GI Bill. VA is committed to protecting the educational opportunities Veterans have earned through their service.”



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Education Law
  • Executive Agencies
  • Federal Government & Politics
  • Intellectual Property
  • Trademark

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  2. 6 Things In-House Counsel Must Know About E-Discovery
    •      
  3. 3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?
    •      
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb: The Caped Crusaders
    •      
  5. U.S. Legal System Ranked as Most Costly
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lenders Win On Foreclosures
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media