Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Nightmare at the Museum

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Nightmare at the Museum

By Lisa Shuchman All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

December 1, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide a copyright case this term that could have serious unintended consequences for the nation's art museums. If it upholds a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, every museum in the country that exhibits modern art created overseas could potentially be infringing artists' copyrights.

"The most basic of museum functions—exhibiting art—could give rise to infringement claims," says Stefan Mentzer, a partner with White & Case who filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court on behalf of the Association of Art Museum Directors and 28 museums of art. "The decision has the potential to disrupt the mission of American museums and interfere with the public's access to art."

On its face, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons has nothing to do with modern art. It concerns Supap Kirtsaeng, who came to the United States from Thailand to study at Cornell University—and found that textbooks published in Asia by Wiley were cheaper than those available in the U.S. He got relatives to ship him copies of the textbooks and made money selling them on eBay. Wiley sued Kirtsaeng for infringing its U.S. copyrights on the books' domestic editions.

Kirtsaeng's defense was based on a provision of copyright law first recognized by the high court in 1908, called the "first-sale doctrine," which allows people to sell used books without permission from the copyright owner. Wiley, however, argued that it doesn't apply to books or other copyrighted materials made overseas. The federal district court and the Second Circuit agreed, and Kirtsaeng appealed to the Supreme Court.

How does the outcome affect museums? The doctrine not only gives the owner of a work the right to resell it, but also to display and lend it without obtaining permission from the copyright holder. Museums had long understood that the law applied to works produced both in the U.S. and overseas. But now that's not clear. "The decision calls into question whether we have the ability to publicly display nearly half our collection," says Troy Klyber, IP manager of the Art Institute of Chicago.



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • White & Case

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Second Circuit
  • Art Institute of Chicago
  • Association of Art Museum Directors
  • eBay Inc.
  • Cornell University
  • John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. 3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?
    •      
  2. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  3. U.S. Legal System Ranked as Most Costly
    •      
  4. Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management
    •      
  5. Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Circuit Reinstates Lawsuit by Inmate Over Cell Conditions
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Custody Ruling in Bitter Fight May Turn on 11-Year-Old's Wish
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out

McVay Wins Superior Court Nod With Western Turnout
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About Corporate Counsel   |
  • Contact Corporate Counsel   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media