Corporate Counsel
  • Home
  • News
  • Surveys
  • Resources
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Bookstore
  • Contact

Topics » IP Insider | Labor & Employment | From the Experts | On the Job | Moves | DC Watch | International

Home > Nightmare at the Museum

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Nightmare at the Museum

By Lisa Shuchman All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

December 1, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide a copyright case this term that could have serious unintended consequences for the nation's art museums. If it upholds a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, every museum in the country that exhibits modern art created overseas could potentially be infringing artists' copyrights.

"The most basic of museum functions—exhibiting art—could give rise to infringement claims," says Stefan Mentzer, a partner with White & Case who filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court on behalf of the Association of Art Museum Directors and 28 museums of art. "The decision has the potential to disrupt the mission of American museums and interfere with the public's access to art."

On its face, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons has nothing to do with modern art. It concerns Supap Kirtsaeng, who came to the United States from Thailand to study at Cornell University—and found that textbooks published in Asia by Wiley were cheaper than those available in the U.S. He got relatives to ship him copies of the textbooks and made money selling them on eBay. Wiley sued Kirtsaeng for infringing its U.S. copyrights on the books' domestic editions.

Kirtsaeng's defense was based on a provision of copyright law first recognized by the high court in 1908, called the "first-sale doctrine," which allows people to sell used books without permission from the copyright owner. Wiley, however, argued that it doesn't apply to books or other copyrighted materials made overseas. The federal district court and the Second Circuit agreed, and Kirtsaeng appealed to the Supreme Court.

How does the outcome affect museums? The doctrine not only gives the owner of a work the right to resell it, but also to display and lend it without obtaining permission from the copyright holder. Museums had long understood that the law applied to works produced both in the U.S. and overseas. But now that's not clear. "The decision calls into question whether we have the ability to publicly display nearly half our collection," says Troy Klyber, IP manager of the Art Institute of Chicago.



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • White & Case

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Second Circuit
  • Art Institute of Chicago
  • Association of Art Museum Directors
  • eBay Inc.
  • Cornell University
  • John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Best Legal Departments 2013
    •      
  2. Bloomberg Names Compliance Chief After Client Data Breach
    •      
  3. Facebook's General Counsel is Leaving Company
    •      
  4. 6 Things In-House Counsel Must Know About E-Discovery
    •      
  5. Wage-and-Hour Suits Up for Fifth Straight Year
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media