Updated at 7 p.m. PST
The California Supreme Court has recused itself from a case that could decide whether current and retired state judges receive $36 million in back pay.
9 minute read
California Supreme Court building at 350 McAllister St. in San Francisco (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM)
Lawyers for the state have asked the high court to take up a 2017 opinion which cleared the way for current and former judges to collect $36 million in back pay.
October 15, 2018 at 03:58 PM
1 minute read
Editor/columnist
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Updated at 7 p.m. PST
The California Supreme Court has recused itself from a case that could decide whether current and retired state judges receive $36 million in back pay.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
